Abstract

We performed a review of the literature (until August 01, 2019) on the occasion of the first transcaval approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in our hospital. This review focuses mainly on the indications of this alternative access route to the aorta. It may be useful for vascular surgeons in selected cases, such as the treatment of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. We describe historical aspects of transcaval access to the aorta, experimental studies, available case series and outcomes. Finally, we summarize the most significant technical aspects of this little-known access.

Highlights

  • Percutaneous aortic valve replacement, known as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), was first performed by Alan Cribier in 2002 (Rouen, France)[1]

  • The aim of this report is to review the indications for this vascular approach, which may be useful for vascular surgeons

  • We found 218 references in the PubMed/MEDLINE database (August 1, 2019) using the following keywords: transcaval (142 references), cavalaortic (15 references), transcaval aortic access (40 references), transcaval and endoleak (19 references), and transcaval and thoracic endovascular aneurysms repair (TEVAR) (2 references)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement, known as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), was first performed by Alan Cribier in 2002 (Rouen, France)[1]. In Spain, the first implantation was performed in 2007, followed shortly by the first in our hospital. This procedure is currently performed in many hospitals. Collaboration between the Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery and the Department of Cardiology in our hospital includes providing, in selected cases, an alternative to conventional vascular access approach (percutaneous femoral artery) for TAVI[2]. Alternative accesses have been described: transthoracic (transapical or transaortic) and extrathoracic (trans-subclavian and transaxillary, transcarotid, transcaval) accesses. The experience with these access routes has shown their advantages and disadvantages[5]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.