Training and Implementation Outcomes of an Adapted Executive Functioning Intervention in Children’s Mental Health Settings

The critical role of executive functioning in autism as well as the co-occurring mental health challenges common among autistic youth support to the immense value of interventions targeting executive functioning for enhancing mental health services for autistic children. The goal of the present study was to conduct a randomized feasibility trial of Unstuck and On Target, an executive functioning intervention, adapted for delivery in children's community mental health setting. Mental health therapists (n = 26) enrolled with participating autistic clients (n = 32) were randomized to receive training in and deliver the adapted Unstuck intervention or to deliver care as usual. We completed masked observational measures of Unstuck strategy use (fidelity) during recorded sessions of participating therapist-client dyads and collected measures of acceptability from participating clients and their caregivers. We also collected measures of pre-post changes in executive functioning and mental health symptoms. Therapists trained in Unstuck demonstrated significantly higher use of Unstuck strategies compared to usual care therapists. Caregivers and autistic clients perceive adapted Unstuck as highly acceptability and helpful. Autistic clients whose therapists were trained in adapted Unstuck demonstrated larger pre-post changes in executive functioning compared to usual care. Across all participating clients, changes in executive functioning were significantly related to changes in mental health symptoms. Finally, clients of therapists trained in adapted Unstuck demonstrated moderate improvements in overall mental health symptoms. The current study provides preliminary evidence of the feasibility and impact of Unstuck and On Target for children's community mental health settings.

In April 2003 the Alberta government integrated specialized mental health services, formerly organized independently, with the health regions, which are responsible for general health services. The objective of this article is to determine whether the transfer was associated with an increase or decrease in the share of resources in the region allocated to mental health care relative to total spending for health care. The measure of the share for mental health care is the total costs for mental health care resources as a percentage of total health care spending. Resources and spending examined were those that were actually or potentially under the regions' control. Annual costs for mental health services in the province were obtained for a seven-year period (fiscal year [FY] 2000 through FY 2006) from provincial utilization records for all residents in the province. Unit costs were assigned to each visit. The trend in the share measure was plotted for each year. The share for mental health care increased overall from FY 2000 (7.6%) to FY 2003 (8.2%), but returned to pre-FY 2003 levels in the three years after the transfer (7.6%). Despite concerns expressed before the transfer by federal and provincial reports over the level of expenditures devoted to mental health care, the integration of mental health services with other health services did not result in an increase of the share for mental health care.

Mental health services play a key role in caring for autistic youth given the common and often unmet mental health needs in this population. There is a pressing need to enhance the uptake and use of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) that improve mental health services for autism and optimize outcomes.EBIs targeting transdiagnostic or key factors relevant across autism and mental health conditionsexist and have the potential to enhance mental health services for autism. Yet, these interventions have not been widely tested. Similarly, autism EBI training is an implementation strategy with the potential to enhance mental health servicequality broadly given specific components and strategies incorporated into the EBI to enhance its impact and fit. This protocol paper describes a multisite study that examines the clinical and implementation effectiveness of a transdiagnostic EBI developed for autistic children compared to a non-autism transdiagnostic EBI in children's mental health settings (Aim 1), confirms engaged clinical and implementation mechanisms (Aim 2), and examines the generalized and expanded effects of EBI training beyond autism (Aim 3). This study will employ a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design to test Unstuck and On Target, an executive functioning EBI adapted for mental health services (autism EBI) and Unified Protocol for Children (non-autism EBI). Twenty-eight mental health programs will be randomized to an EBI condition and 224 therapists across these programs will be recruited and receive EBI training. Additionally, 224 autistic children and 224 non-autistic children, yoked to participating therapists, will be recruited as EBI recipients. This study will measure clinical (mental health symptom change) and implementation outcomes (EBI fidelity, training engagement, psychotherapy quality, reach) and clinical (executive functioning skills, emotion regulation skills) and implementation (autism self-efficacy and knowledge, perception of fit) mechanisms. This study will confirm the effectiveness of a promising executive functioning EBI in mental health settings as well as generate clinical knowledge about the potential of transdiagnostic interventions improve mental health outcomes for autistic children. Findings also have immense potential to demonstrate the ability of autism EBIs to enhance mental health services for autistic and non-autistic children more broadly. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06651086). Registered on October 18, 2024.

Policy Recommendations to Promote Integrated Mental Health Care for Children and Youth.

There is an urgent need for targeted efforts to better translate effective, evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to community settings. EBI adaptations or modifications that respond to community members’ needs and recommendations are critical to improve fit and use in publicly funded children’s mental health services. The current mixed-methods study utilized caregiver and mental health therapist perspectives regarding the perceived fit and necessary adaptations to a school-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting executive functioning for implementation in children’s mental health settings. We gathered community perspectives through surveys (n = 43) and four focus groups with mental health therapists (total n = 14, mean participants per focus group = 3.5, range 2–5) and semi-structured interviews with caregivers (n = 17). Results indicated the perceived relevance of an EBI targeting executive functioning in mental health services. Key adaptation recommendations included: a) modifying and simplifying intervention materials, b) incorporating educational material regarding executive function, c) a stronger emphasis on caregiver involvement, and d) adjusting the intervention format and length to improve fit with the mental health services context. Findings suggest community-partnered processes are necessary to adapt EBIs as well as to improve fit and translation between school and mental health settings. We also review resulting adaptations as well as next steps and future recommendations.

Opportunities in mental health services research.

Focus on Transformation: A Public Health Model of Mental Health for the 21st Century

This study examined turnover rates of teams implementing psychosocial evidence-based practices in public-sector mental health settings. It also explored the relationship between turnover and implementation outcomes in an effort to understand whether practitioner perspectives on turnover are related to implementation outcomes. Team turnover was measured for 42 implementing teams participating in a national demonstration project examining implementation of five evidence-based practices between 2002 and 2005. Regression techniques were used to analyze the effects of team turnover on penetration and fidelity. Qualitative data collected throughout the project were blended with the quantitative data to examine the significance of team turnover to those attempting to implement the practices. High team turnover was common (M+/-SD=81%+/-46%) and did not vary by practice. The 24-month turnover rate was inversely related to fidelity scores at 24 months (N=40, beta=-.005, p=.01). A negative trend was observed for penetration. Further analysis indicated that 71% of teams noted that turnover was a relevant factor in implementation. The behavioral health workforce remains in flux. High turnover most often had a negative impact on implementation, although some teams were able to use strategies to improve implementation through turnover. Implementation models must consider turbulent behavioral health workforce conditions.

Mental health care among marginalized populations in the United States

Issues in Medicaid Policy and System Transformation: Recommendations From the President's Commission

Lessons learned in developing community mental health care in Australasia and the South Pacific

This paper summarizes the history of the development of Chinese mental health system; the current situation in the mental health field that China has to face in its effort to reform the system, including mental health burden, workforce and resources, as well as structural issues; the process of national mental health service reform, including how it was included into the national public health program, how it began as a training program and then became a treatment and intervention program, its unique training and capacity building model, and its outcomes and impacts; the barriers and challenges of the reform process; future suggestions for policy; and Chinese experiences as response to the international advocacy for the development of mental health.

Meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals for mental health: why greater prioritization and adequately tracking progress are critical.

BackgroundThe criminal justice system is the largest provider of mental health services in the USA. Many jurisdictions are interested in reducing the use of the justice system for mental health problems. The national Stepping Up Initiative helps agencies within counties work together more effectively to reduce the number of individuals with mental illness in jails and to improve access to mental health services in the community. This study will compare Stepping Up counties to matched comparison counties over time to (1) examine the effectiveness of Stepping Up and (2) test hypothesized implementation mechanisms to inform multi-agency implementation efforts more broadly.MethodsThe study will survey 950 counties at baseline, 18 months, and 36 months in a quasi-experimental design comparing implementation mechanisms and outcomes between 475 Stepping Up counties and 475 matched comparison counties. Surveys will be sent to up to four respondents per county including administrators of jail, probation, community mental health services, and community substance use treatment services (3800 total respondents). We will examine whether Stepping Up counties show faster improvements in implementation outcomes (number of justice-involved clients receiving behavioral health services, number of behavioral health evidence-based practices and policies [EBPPs] available to justice-involved individuals, and resources for behavioral health EBPP for justice-involved individuals) than do matched comparison counties. We will also evaluate whether engagement of hypothesized mechanisms explains differences in implementation outcomes. Implementation target mechanisms include (1) use of and capacity for performance monitoring, (2) use and functioning of interagency teams, (3) common goals and mission across agencies, and (4) system integration (i.e., building an integrated system of care rather than adding one program or training). Finally, we will characterize implementation processes and critical incidents using survey responses and qualitative interviews.DiscussionThere are few rigorous, prospective studies examining implementation mechanisms and their relationship with behavioral health implementation outcomes in justice and associated community behavioral health settings. There is also limited understanding of implementation mechanisms that occur across systems with multiple goals. This study will describe implementation outcomes of Stepping Up and will elucidate target mechanisms that are effective in multi-goal, multi-agency systems.

Project Liberty: New York's Crisis Counseling Program Created in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001