Abstract
Systemic risk reduction in banking is a key component in maintaining financial stability. Even after extensive explorations, the role of nontraditional activites in systemic risk still offers several questions to study. The paper aims to contribute to the literature on the topic by empirically examining whether traditional and nontraditional banking activities differ in terms of systemic risk. To answer this question, traditional commercial banking is assumed to be represented by the loan-deposit interest margin income component. Hungarian banking sector data between 2003 and 2020 are analyzed with principal component analysis and multidimensional scaling. The primary measure in systemic risk quantification is the return covariance-based absorption ratio. Empirical findings suggest that, when compared to a more diverse range of banking activities, traditional commercial banking may be characterized by lower systemic risk. Although in these two cases the most influential components of systemic risk may be considered as similar, the other components exhibit significant differences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.