Abstract

Simple SummaryTo increase the probability of reunions occurring between owners and lost pets, tracking devices are applied to pets. The pet’s position is determined by satellites (e.g., GPS) and transmitted by radio frequencies (RFs) to a mobile phone. In this study, the health risks from exposure to radio frequencies emitted by radios, TVs, mobile networks, indoor devices (e.g., WLAN, Bluetooth), mobile phones, and in the use of such tracking devices were investigated. The radiation exposure was found to be well below international limit values, which means that adverse health effects are unlikely to occur. The risk of high exposure of pets is mainly caused by indoor RF-emitting devices, such as WLAN devices. This exposure can be limited through a reduction in the exposure time and an increase in the distance between the animal and the RF-emitting device. Even though the exposure of pets to total radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) levels was found to be below the limit values—and, therefore, not a health risk—recommendations are given for the use of tracking devices and to limit the exposure to indoor devices.Every year, approximately 3% of cats and dogs are lost. In addition to passive methods for identifying pets, radiofrequency tracking devices (TDs) are available. These TDs can track a pet’s geographic position, which is transmitted by radio frequencies. The health risk to the animals from continuous exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) was reviewed. Fourteen out of twenty-one commercially available TDs use 2G, 3G, or 4G mobile networks, and the others work with public frequencies, WLAN, Bluetooth, etc. The exposure of pets to RF-EMFs was assessed, including ambient exposure (radios, TVs, and base stations of mobile networks), exposure from indoor devices (DECT, WLAN, Bluetooth, etc.), and the exposure from TDs. The exposure levels of the three areas were found to be distinctly below the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) reference levels, which assure far-reaching protection from adverse health effects. The highest uncertainty regarding the exposure of pets was related to that caused by indoor RF-emitting devices using WLAN and DECT. This exposure can be limited considerably through a reduction in the exposure time and an increase in the distance between the animal and the RF-emitting device. Even though the total RF-EMF exposure level experienced by pets was found to be below the reference limits, recommendations were derived to reduce potential risks from exposure to TDs and indoor devices.

Highlights

  • Over any period of five years, approximately 15% of cat and dog owners lose their pets

  • Another method involves the use of active tracking devices (TDs), which can derive the geographic position of an animal by using global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) (e.g., the Global Positioning System (GPS) or the European system GALILEO)

  • The examination of the radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) exposure of pets and the related risk assessment show that the sum of the values for all three categories of exposure lies distinctly below the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) reference levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over any period of five years, approximately 15% of cat and dog owners lose their pets. This means that the finder has to contact an animal shelter or a veterinarian to identify the animal Another method involves the use of active TDs, which can derive the geographic position of an animal by using global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) (e.g., the Global Positioning System (GPS) or the European system GALILEO). Passive identification methods increase the frequency of unification [6], active systems, such as TDs, possibly have an even greater reunion success rate This seems to be due to their advantage of being able to instantaneously identify the geographical location of the stray animal. In addition to the geographic coordinates of the position, other information, such as environmental parameters (e.g., temperature) and the parameters describing the physical activities of the animals, can be transmitted [8]

Overview of Tracking Devices for Pets and Horses
Biological Effects of RF-EMFs and Health-Related Limit Values
Exposure and Risk Assessment
Ambient Exposure of Pets
Exposure by Indoor Devices
Bluetooth
Baby Surveillance Devices
Exposure by Tracking Devices
Risk Assessment Regarding RF-EMF Exposure
Findings
Conclusions and Recommendations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.