Abstract
Notwithstanding Truscott's 1996 review article sparked the grammatical correction debate, no earlier bibliometric analysis has focused on the publications that cited it. This study aimed to determine the degree to which publications citing Truscott's 1996 study had evolved and to give a conceptual framework for 427 papers. This study used two bibliometric programs, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, to evaluate and display the data. The results visualized that the pro-correction side has prevailed and is influential in L2 writing practices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
