Abstract

Abstract Aims Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) is an essential component of comprehensive assessment of a surgical patients, both in acute and elective settings. Due to the intimate nature of the examination, this important examination is often not well taught. This study aims to assess the confidence and knowledge of the Foundation Year 1 (FY1) doctors in performing DRE. Methods FY1 doctors were invited for online voluntary anonymous survey via Google forms. The survey consisted of 16 questions on the indications, findings and interpretation of DRE. The purpose and aims of the study were explained in an invitation email and participants provided a declaration of consent, giving permission for their anonymous results to be used in the study. Results There were 24 responses, 79% had performed DRE (including on mannequins and simulations) less than 10 times. Two thirds of DRE were performed during the FY1 rotation and two thirds in the elective wards. Majority of respondents (83%) were moderately confident in performing and appreciating DRE findings. 63% respondents though that a chaperone is not mandatory if the gender of the doctor and patient was same. 58% respondents thought that hematuria is not an indication to preform DRE. Interpretation of DRE findings - approximately 80% respondents correctly interpreted the findings, however only 45% could formulate the correct initial management plan. Conclusions This study illustrates that FY1 doctors receive inadequate exposure to performing and interpreting DRE. Their teaching should be enhanced by providing them with more opportunities through simulation and dedicated teaching sessions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.