Abstract

Within the context of Mozambique, this paper examines the state of forest ecosystem services, the dependency of the population on these systems for their well-being, if an adaptive governance regime is being created which will ensure the resilience of the forest ecosystem services including the legal framework, the institutions operating within this framework, the tools available and their functioning, and how cooperative governance is operating.KEYWORDS: Ecosystem services, Mozambique, legal framework for ecosystem services; cooperative governance and ecosystem services; government institutions and ecosystem services; adaptive governance and ecosystem services; forest ecosystem services and resilience

Highlights

  • Box 1 -Definition of forest and woodlandsThe UN Framework Convention on Climate Change defined forests and woodlands as having between 10% to 40% canopy closure.FAO (2000) defines forest ecosystems as areas that are dominated by trees, where tree cover exceeds 10% and the area is larger than 0.5ha and includes areas for production, protection, multiple use or conservation, and stands on agricultural land

  • Within the context of Mozambique, this paper examines the state of forest ecosystem services, the dependency of the population on these systems for their well-being, if an adaptive governance regime is being created which will ensure the resilience of the forest ecosystem services including the legal framework, the institutions operating within this framework, the tools available and their functioning, and how cooperative governance is operating

  • According to Wertz-Kanounnikoff, Sitoe and Salamao,86 the REDD+ process in Mozambique has largely been driven by Mozambicans and not consultants, as the draft REDD+ strategy was written before Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) support of the Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP) development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change defined forests and woodlands as having between 10% to 40% canopy closure. FAO (2000) defines forest ecosystems as areas that are dominated by trees (perennial woody plants taller than 5m at maturity), where tree cover exceeds 10% and the area is larger than 0.5ha and includes areas for production, protection, multiple use or conservation, and stands on agricultural land. This was the basic definition used by the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005 carried out between 2001 and 2005) defined ‘ecosystem services’ as ‘the benefits people obtain from ecosystems’.1 It identified four categories of ecosystem services, including provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting. Within the context of Mozambique, this paper examines the state of forest ecosystem services, the dependency of the population on these systems for their well-being, if an adaptive governance regime is being created which will ensure the resilience of the forest ecosystem services including the legal framework, the institutions operating within this framework, the tools available and their functioning, and how cooperative governance is operating

State of the forest ecosystem services
State of human well-being
Drivers of change
Constitutional principles regarding the environment and natural resources
Overview of the legal framework
The approach to provisioning services
The question of ownership
Transparency and conflicts of interest
Wildlife and food resources
Genetic resources
Protecting benefits obtained from the regulation of ecosystem processes
The law and non-material benefits obtained from ecosystems
The role and status of environmental impact assessments
The contribution of international conventions ratified by Mozambique
Integration and institutional coordination
Cooperative governance and shared decision-making
Compliance and enforcement
66 Environmental Investigation Agency First Class Connections
The contribution from planning and research
Territorial planning and forest inventories
Research institutions and monitoring
Genuine valuation of services provided by forests
Other economic instruments
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.