Abstract
Critical thinking is an important part of media literacy. It allows people to find facts among rumors and to inactivate false information. Such abilities are essential when social media is flooded with rumors during disaster response. We envision a social-technological system in which critical thinking is crowd-sourced: Individuals benefit from others' criticisms of false information, and the system inactivates the spread of false information. To test the plausibility of this system, we examined the effect of exposure to criticisms on people’s decision to spread rumors in social media. When people were exposed to criticisms before rumors, the proportion of responses aimed at stopping the spread of rumors was significantly larger than when people were exposed to rumors before criticisms. We identified some psychological factors that could explain this effect. Based on our results, we discuss practical implications for developing a social-technological system that harnesses the critical thinking of crowds.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
