Abstract

In outcome-based academic programs, Program Education Objects (PEOs) are the key pillars on which program components are built. They are articulated linguistically as broad statements of graduates’ professional and career accomplishments within a few years of graduation. Moreover, PEOs are mapped into a set of skills and attributes known as Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs). It goes without saying that a profound understanding of the PEOs is a key factor in the success of an academic program. For this sake, this paper proposes a data analytics-based approach to examine the correlations among PEOs. More specifically, it applies a data similarity-based approach to analyze the correlations among the PEOs of engineering programs. To this end, a dataset of PEOs–PLOs mapping of a set of engineering programs has been extracted from their self-study reports. The collected dataset has undergone preprocessing steps to transform it into a suitable representation. This involves data cleaning, data annotation using a developed set of PEOs labels, and removal of data instances with multiple PEO labels. Each PEO is then represented as a vector space model whose dimensions are the PLOs, and their values are the relative frequencies of PLOs computed from all data instances of that PEO. After that, three data similarity measures, namely Euclidean distance, cosine measure, and Manhattan distance, are applied to measure the similarity between PEOs vector space models. The resultant similarity matrices are then analyzed at the level of a specific measure, an agreement between measures, and average similarity across all measures. The analysis results contribute to a better understanding of the PEOs correlations and provide very useful actionable insights for empowering decision making toward systemization and optimization of academic programs processes.

Highlights

  • Over the past century, the ability of education systems to equip graduates with the necessary professional and career skills needed for the 21st century has been questioned [1,2].the need for an effective education system that focuses on the potential and actual abilities of the graduate has become more crucial

  • Considering all the aforementioned drawn findings from the previous applications of data similarity measures, this paper explores the application of data similarity measures in a new educational context that is the correlation among educational objectives of academic programs

  • We present and discusses the results of applying the three data similarity measures to compute the similarity between Program Education Objects (PEOs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability of education systems to equip graduates with the necessary professional and career skills needed for the 21st century has been questioned [1,2].the need for an effective education system that focuses on the potential and actual abilities of the graduate has become more crucial. The OBE approach is becoming prevalent in higher education academic programs. It is realized through identifying three types of outcomes: PEOs, PLOs, and Course Outcomes (COs) [4]. PEOs describe, in broad statements, career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing its graduates to achieve, PLOs describe, in narrower statements, the knowledge, Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9623 describe, in broad statements, career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing its graduates to achieve, PLOs describe, in narrower statements, the knowledge, skills, andthose behaviors those students aretoexpected attain byofthe time of gradskills, and behaviors students are expected attain bytothe time graduation [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.