Torsion classes of extended Dynkin quivers over commutative rings

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon
Take notes icon Take Notes

Abstract For a Noetherian ‐algebra , there is a canonical inclusion , and each element in the image satisfies a certain compatibility condition. We call compatible if the image coincides with the set of all compatible elements. For example, for a Dynkin quiver and a commutative Noetherian ring , the path algebra is compatible. In this paper, we prove that is compatible when is an extended Dynkin quiver and is either a Dedekind domain or a Noetherian semilocal normal ring of dimension 2.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter
  • Cite Count Icon 56
  • 10.1007/978-1-4612-3660-3_25
A Method for the Study of Artinian Modules, With an Application to Asymptotic Behavior
  • Jan 1, 1989
  • R Y Sharp

If N is a Noetherian module over the commutative ring R (throughout the paper, R will denote a commutative ring with identity), then the study of N in many contexts can be reduced to the study of a finitely generated module over a commutative Noetherian ring, because N has a natural structure as a module over R/(0 : N) and the latter ring is Noetherian. For a long time it has been a source of irritation to me that I did not know of any method which would reduce the study of an Artinian module A over the commutative ring R to the study of an Artinian module over a commutative Noetherian ring. However, during the MSRI Microprogram on Commutative Algebra, my attention was drawn to a result of W. Heinzer and D. Lantz [2, Proposition 4.3]; this proposition proves that if A is a faithful Artinian module over a quasi-local ring (R, M) which is (Hausdorff) complete in the M-adic topology, then R is Noetherian. It turns out that a generalization of this result provides a missing link to complete a chain of reductions by which one can, for some purposes, reduce the study of an Artinian module over an arbitrary commutative ring R to the study of an Artinian module over a complete (Noetherian) local ring; in the latter situation we have Matlis’s duality available, and this means that the investigation can often be converted into a dual one about a finitely generated module over a complete (Noetherian) local ring.KeywordsLocal RingMaximal IdealCommutative RingHomomorphic ImageNoetherian RingThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 29
  • 10.1007/s10474-006-0097-6
On weakly prime radical of modules and semi-compatible modules
  • Nov 1, 2006
  • Acta Mathematica Hungarica
  • M Behboodi

Let M be a left R-module. Then a proper submodule P of M is called weakly prime submodule if for any ideals A and B of R and any submodule N of M such that ABN ⊆ P, we have AN ⊆ P or BN ⊆ P. We define weakly prime radicals of modules and show that for Ore domains, the study of weakly prime radicals of general modules reduces to that of torsion modules. We determine the weakly prime radical of any module over a commutative domain R with dim (R) ≦ 1. Also, we show that over a commutative domain R with dim (R) ≦ 1, every semiprime submodule of any module is an intersection of weakly prime submodules. Localization of a module over a commutative ring preserves the weakly prime property. An R-module M is called semi-compatible if every weakly prime submodule of M is an intersection of prime submodules. Also, a ring R is called semi-compatible if every R-module is semi-compatible. It is shown that any projective module over a commutative ring is semi-compatible and that a commutative Noetherian ring R is semi-compatible if and only if for every prime ideal B of R, the ring R/\B is a Dedekind domain. Finally, we show that if R is a UFD such that the free R-module R⊕ R is a semi-compatible module, then R is a Bezout domain.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106364
Unique decomposition into ideals for commutative Noetherian rings
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
  • Lee Klingler + 1 more

Unique decomposition into ideals for commutative Noetherian rings

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1007/bf01431462
The torsion submodule splits off
  • Dec 1, 1970
  • Mathematische Annalen
  • Mark L Teply + 1 more

A classical question for modules over an integral domain is, "When is the torsion submodule t(A) of a module A a direct summand of AT' A module is said to split when its torsion submodule is a direct summand. Kaplansky has shown [-14] that if R is a Dedekind domain, then every module whose torsion submodule is of bounded order splits. The converse of this result has been shown by Chase [5]. Results of [15] and [3] show that every finitely generated module splits if and only if R is a Priifer domain. Finally, if every R-module splits, then Rotman has shown [19] that R must be a field. Recently, many concepts of torsion have been proposed for modules over arbitrary associative rings with identity. Almost all of these are special cases of "torsion theories" in the sense of Dickson [6]. Moreover, most of these torsion theories are hereditary (i.e., the submodule of a torsion module is torsion); and hereditary torsion classes are classes of negligible modules associated with a topologizing and idempotent filter of left ideals in the sense of Gabriel [12] (also see [17]). Some recent papers ([4], [7], and [11]) have dealt with splitting results for specific hereditary torsion theories over certain commutative rings. The main purpose of this paper is to continue the investigation of the splitting properties of a torsion theory of modules over a commutative ring. Some characterizations for the splitting of modules, whose torsion submodules have bounded order, are obtained (see definition of bounded order below and Theorems 2.2 and 4.6). In particular, these results generalize the abovementioned theorems of Chase [5] and Kaplansky [14]. Our results show that the splitting of modules whose torsion submodules have bounded order frequently forces non-zero torsion modules to have non-zero socles. This increases our interest in the smallest hereditary torsion class 6e containing the simple modules. The class ow has previously been used in the study of commutative Noetherian rings and (left) perfect rings (e.g., see [7] and [10] and their references). For a commutative ring R, we show that 6e(A) is a summand of each R-module A if and only if non-zero R-modules have non-zero socles. This generalizes the main results of [7] and [11]; moreover, in case R is a Dedekind domain, our result coincides with the above result of Rotman. We also examine the properties of a splitting hereditary torsion theory of modules over a local ring R (unique maximal left ideal). We show that if R possesses a non-trivial torsion theory (~--, #-) such that every finitely generated module splits, then R is an integral domain, and (Y-, ~ is Goldie's torsion

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1216/jca.2022.14.37
Countably generated flat modules are quite flat
  • Mar 1, 2022
  • Journal of Commutative Algebra
  • Michal Hrbek + 2 more

We prove that if R is a commutative Noetherian ring, then every countably generated flat R-module is quite flat, i.e., a direct summand of a transfinite extension of localizations of R in countable multiplicative subsets. We also show that if the spectrum of R is of cardinality less than κ, where κ is an uncountable regular cardinal, then every flat R-module is a transfinite extension of flat modules with less than κ generators. This provides an alternative proof of the fact that over a commutative Noetherian ring with countable spectrum, all flat modules are quite flat. More generally, we say that a commutative ring is CFQ if every countably presented flat R-module is quite flat. We show that all von Neumann regular rings and all S-almost perfect rings are CFQ. A zero-dimensional local ring is CFQ if and only if it is perfect. A domain is CFQ if and only if all its proper quotient rings are CFQ. A valuation domain is CFQ if and only if it is strongly discrete.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 108
  • 10.1016/j.jpaa.2009.03.013
The total graph and regular graph of a commutative ring
  • Apr 18, 2009
  • Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
  • S Akbari + 3 more

The total graph and regular graph of a commutative ring

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1016/0021-8693(91)90286-h
State spaces, finite algebras, and skew group rings
  • May 1, 1991
  • Journal of Algebra
  • Ricardo Alfaro

State spaces, finite algebras, and skew group rings

  • Research Article
  • 10.1134/s1995080210010026
On semi-pseudo-valuation rings and their extensions
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
  • V K Bhat

Recall that a commutative ring R is said to be a pseudo-valuation ring (PVR) if every prime ideal of R is strongly prime. We say that a commutative Noetherian ring R is semi-pseudo-valuation ring if assassinator of every right ideal (which is uniform as a right R-module) is a strongly prime ideal. We also recall that a prime ideal P of a ring R is said to be divided if it is comparable (under inclusion) to every ideal of R. A ring R is called a divided ring if every prime ideal of R is divided. Let R be a commutative ring, σ an automorphism of R and δ a σ-derivation of R. We say that a prime ideal P of R is δ-divided if it is comparable (under inclusion) to every σ-stable and δ-invariant ideal I of R. A ring R is called a δ-divided ring if every prime ideal of R is δ-divided. We say that a Noetherian ring R is semi-δ-divided ring if assassinator of every right ideal (which is uniform as a right R-module) is δ-divided. Let R be a ring and σ an endomorphism of R. Recall that R is said to be a σ(*)-ring if aσ(a) ∈ P(R) implies that a ∈ P(R), where P(R) is the prime radical of R. With this we prove the following

  • Research Article
  • 10.1080/00927879608825587
Some remarks on growth of algebras over commutative noetherian rings
  • Jan 1, 1996
  • Communications in Algebra
  • R.A Beaulieu + 2 more

Using a growth function,GK defined for algebras over integral domains, we construct a generalization of Gelfand Kirillov dimensionGGK. GGK coincides with the classical no-tion of GK for algebras over a field, but is defined for algebras over arbitrary commutative rings. It is proved that GGK exceeds the Krull dimension for affine Noetherian PI algebras. The main result is that algebras of GGK at most one are PI for a large class of commutative Noetherian base rings including the ring of integers, Z. This extends the well-known result of Small, Stafford, and Warfield found in [11].

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 4
  • 10.1080/00927872.2020.1750622
On secondary and representable modules over almost Dedekind domains
  • Apr 22, 2020
  • Communications in Algebra
  • N Pakyari + 2 more

Matlis showed that an injective module over a commutative Noetherian ring R can be completely decomposed as a direct sum of indecomposable injective submodules. In this paper, we prove the Matlis’ Theorem for almost Dedekind domains. Then we characterize the secondary modules and classify the indecomposable secondary modules over almost Dedekind domains. Also we prove every P-secondary module over an almost Dedekind domain is pure-injective, where Finally, we characterize the representable finitely generated modules over almost Dedekind domains.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1142/s0219498813500564
SOME CRITERIA FOR THE FINITENESS OF COZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS
  • Jul 31, 2013
  • Journal of Algebra and Its Applications
  • S Akbari + 1 more

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. The cozero-divisor graph of R denoted by Γ'(R) is a graph with the vertex set W*(R), where W*(R) is the set of all nonzero and non-unit elements of R, and two distinct vertices a and b are adjacent if and only if a ∉ Rb and b ∉ Ra, where Rc is the ideal generated by the element c in R. Let α(Γ'(R)) and γ(Γ'(R)) denote the independence number and the domination number of Γ'(R), respectively. In this paper, we prove that if α(Γ'(R)) is finite, then R is Artinian if and only if R is Noetherian. Also, we prove that if α(Γ'(R)) is finite, then R/P is finite, for every prime ideal P. Moreover, we prove that if R is a Noetherian ring, γ(Γ'(R)) is finite and Γ'(R) has at least one isolated vertex, then J(R) = N(R). We show that if R is a commutative Noetherian local ring, γ(Γ'(R)) is finite and Γ'(R) has at least one isolated vertex, then R is a finite ring. Among other results, we prove that if R is a commutative ring and the maximum degree of Γ'(R) is finite and positive, then R is a finite ring.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 29
  • 10.1080/00927879408824957
A principal ideal theorem analogue for modules over commutative rings
  • Jan 1, 1994
  • Communications in Algebra
  • Seleena M George + 2 more

The Principal Ideal Theorem states that if Re is a commutative Noetherian ring and ? is a prime ideal of Re which is minimal over a principal ideal then Pe has height at most 1. Also, if Re is a (not necessarily Noetherian) UFD and Pe is a prime ideal of Re minimal over a principal ideal then Pe has height at most 1. We shall show that there are analogues for modules over commutative rings, but they hold only in special cases.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1080/00927872.2010.489916
On Fully Idempotent Modules
  • Aug 1, 2011
  • Communications in Algebra
  • Derya Keskin Tütüncü + 3 more

A submodule N of a module M is idempotent if N = Hom(M, N)N. The module M is fully idempotent if every submodule of M is idempotent. We prove that over a commutative ring, cyclic idempotent submodules of any module are direct summands. Counterexamples are given to show that this result is not true in general. It is shown that over commutative Noetherian rings, the fully idempotent modules are precisely the semisimple modules. We also show that the commutative rings over which every module is fully idempotent are exactly the semisimple rings. Idempotent submodules of free modules are characterized.

  • Supplementary Content
  • 10.1090/conm/785/15788
On Continuous Hulls of Rings and Modules
  • Jan 1, 2023
  • Contemporary Mathematics
  • Jae Park + 1 more

Every module has an injective hull, a quasi-injective hull, and a quasi-continuous hull. However, there exists a uniform nonsingular cyclic module over a noncommutative ring which has no continuous hull. (Recall that the continuous hull of a module M M is the smallest continuous extension of M M in a fixed injective hull E ( M ) E(M) of M M .) When the base ring is commutative, every uniform cyclic module over a commutative ring has a continuous hull. Further, every nonsingular cyclic module over a commutative ring has a continuous hull. Motivated by the example and these results on continuous hulls, it is interesting to study whether R R R_R has a continuous hull for any ring R R . We show that for any integer n n such that n > 1 n>1 , if R R is the n × n n\times n matrix ring over any given ring or the n × n n\times n upper triangular matrix ring over any given ring, then R R R_R has a continuous hull and such a continuous hull is explicitly described. Moreover, if R R is an abelian regular ring, it is shown that every nonsingular cyclic right R R -module has a continuous hull. As an application, we show that R R R_R has a continuous hull when R R is an abelian regular ring. In this case, R B ( Q ( R ) ) R R\mathcal {B}(Q(R))_R (where R B ( Q ( R ) ) R\mathcal {B}(Q(R)) is the idempotent closure of R R ) is the continuous hull of R R R_R . As a byproduct, we show that when R R is an abelian regular ring, R B ( Q ( R ) ) R\mathcal {B}(Q(R)) is the smallest continuous regular ring of quotients of R R . We discuss the condition ( ⋆ \star ) of a commutative ring R R , which is precisely that the classical ring of quotients of every uniform factor ring of R R is self-injective. Moreover, by using the condition ( ⋆ \star ), we provide a detailed proof that every module over a commutative noetherian ring has a continuous hull. Various examples which illustrate our results are provided.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 25
  • 10.1090/s0002-9947-1962-0141683-4
Axiomatic primary and tertiary decomposition theory
  • Jan 1, 1962
  • Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
  • John A Riley

Introduction.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
  • Ask R Discovery Star icon
  • Chat PDF Star icon

AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.