Abstract

Abstract. We present top-down estimates of anthropogenic CO, NOx and CO2 surface fluxes at mesoscale using a Lagrangian model in combination with three different WRF model configurations, driven by data from aircraft flights during the CALNEX campaign in southern California in May–June 2010. The US EPA National Emission Inventory 2005 (NEI 2005) was the prior in the CO and NOx inversion calculations. The flux ratio inversion method, based on linear relationships between chemical species, was used to calculate the CO2 inventory without prior knowledge of CO2 surface fluxes. The inversion was applied to each flight to estimate the variability of single-flight-based flux estimates. In Los Angeles (LA) County, the uncertainties on CO and NOx fluxes were 10% and 15%, respectively. Compared with NEI 2005, the CO posterior emissions were lower by 43% in LA County and by 37% in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). NOx posterior emissions were lower by 32% in LA County and by 27% in the SoCAB. NOx posterior emissions were 40% lower on weekends relative to weekdays. The CO2 posterior estimates were 183 Tg yr−1 in SoCAB. A flight during ITCT (Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation) in 2002 was used to estimate emissions in the LA Basin in 2002. From 2002 to 2010, the CO and NOx posterior emissions decreased by 41% and 37%, respectively, in agreement with previous studies. Over the same time period, CO2 emissions increased by 10% in LA County but decreased by 4% in the SoCAB, a statistically insignificant change. Overall, the posterior estimates were in good agreement with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) inventory, with differences of 15% or less. However, the posterior spatial distribution in the basin was significantly different from CARB for NOx emissions. WRF-Chem mesoscale chemical-transport model simulations allowed an evaluation of differences in chemistry using different inventory assumptions, including NEI 2005, a gridded CARB inventory and the posterior inventories derived in this study. The biases in WRF-Chem ozone were reduced and correlations were increased using the posterior from this study compared with simulations with the two bottom-up inventories, suggesting that improving the spatial distribution of ozone precursor surface emissions is also important in mesoscale chemistry simulations.

Highlights

  • The Los Angeles (LA) Basin, a large urban area with emissions from mobile sources, industry and agriculture, is a challenging region for chemical-transport models

  • The uncertainty is lower along the coast and is higher in complex terrain, where it is more difficult for the inverse modeling technique to converge to a single solution due to the transport uncertainties associated with large terrain changes within a single grid cell or a few adjacent cells (Brioude et al, 2012b)

  • Compared to National Emission Inventory (NEI) 2005, the daytime CO posterior estimates during weekdays were lower by 43 % ± 6 % in LA County and by 37 % ± 10 % in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Los Angeles (LA) Basin, a large urban area with emissions from mobile sources, industry and agriculture, is a challenging region for chemical-transport models. A recent study has shown a steady decrease in emission of VOCs over the past decades in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB; Warneke et al, 2012) Those large reductions over time result in substantial uncertainties in surface emission estimates of ozone precursors based on bottom-up inventories from previous years and impact the accuracy of air quality forecasts. A recent study has shown that a substantial weekend effect exists in the LA Basin, such that large reductions in NOx emissions on weekends relative to weekdays result in higher weekend ozone production efficiencies (Pollack et al, 2012) These observations provide opportunities to assess the ability of emission inventories to capture interannual and day-of-week variability in the Basin’s emissions and the impacts of these emissions changes on air quality

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.