Abstract
Introduction. The development of modern Russia is characterized by a high degree of differentiation in the level of socio-economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Interregional cooperation is one of the tools to overcome this differentiation. Although new forms of such cooperation have been emerging, its potential remains underestimated. The purpose of the study is to analyze the existing and prospective forms of cooperation between the regions of Russia. Materials and Methods. The study based on a structural and substantive analysis of regulatory legal acts of the federal and regional levels, as well as on strategic planning documents, various forms of budget reporting, bilateral and multilateral agreements between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation aimed at identifying various areas, tools and mechanisms for ensuring interregional cooperation. Results. The authors have considered the tools of interregional cooperation that involve direct financial participation of regional authorities or economic entities. The role and prospects of horizontal subsidies and budget loans provided by one region to another have been identified, their legal and regulatory justification has been given; a financial assessment has been made, and the identified practices have been analyzed. In terms of the implementation of public procurement from suppliers based in other regions, the authors have estimated the degree of how closed or open the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are. Discussion and Conclusion. The authors have confirmed the idea that interregional cooperation in Russia is still underdeveloped and lacks legislative and scientific-methodological justification. The authors also assess the prospects for further development of interregional cooperation in Russia and suggest a number of measures to promote it. The results of the study can be used in the interests of the authorities to improve the system of regulation of various mechanisms of regional cooperation, as well as to develop the scientific potential in this area.
Highlights
International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia
Its key factor is innovation, which, in turn, is determined by the availability of sufficient amount of human capital, it being a set of knowledge, skills and abilities, including the ability of a person to generate ideas, create innovations, and bring them to production
The theoretical foundations of the study include the works of Russian and foreign academic economists, generalization and critical analysis of which made it possible to show the indirect impact of human capital on sustainable development
Summary
The factors in the liquidation orientation of the institution of insolvency in the Russian Federation, as well as the trends in the increase in duration of insolvency proceedings with a minimum number of satisfied creditor claims have been identified; counterarguments have been presented regarding the alleged low efficiency of trustees in bankruptcy; arguments concerning the annual increase in the workload of trustees in bankruptcy have been statistically supported. 126 Федерального закона «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)»); б) препятствование проведению инвентаризации; в) обжалование результатов оценки, обращение в арбитражный суд с заявлениями о разрешении разногласий в части порядка реализации имущества должника; г) включение аффилированных лиц в реестр требований кредиторов должника с целью аккумулирования большинства голосов для контроля над процедурой; д) попытки приостановления торгов, оспаривание результатов торгов, жалобы в Федеральную антимонопольную службу Российской Федерации; е) жалобы на действия арбитражного управляющего, давление на него посредством подачи жалоб в Управление Росреестра с целью отстранения от процедуры или же полной дисквалификации управляющего; ‒ величина и разнородность конкурсной массы, что приводит к необходимости организации нескольких длительных процедур торгов; ‒ комплексный и ресурсозатратный характер деятельности арбитражного управляющего по оспариванию подозрительных сделок должника с последующей реализацией возвращенных в конкурсную массу активов или прав требования к третьим лицам; ‒ юридической работой по привлечению к субсидиарной ответственности контролирующих лиц должника. Результаты исследования представляют интерес для арбитражных управляющих, специалистов, сопровождающих процедуры банкротства, а также студентов факультетов экономического и юридического профилей, поскольку включают в себя не только обширный статистический анализ эффективности института несостоятельности в его действующем состоянии, но и сравнительный анализ законопроекта изменений в Федеральный закон «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» с точки зрения профессионального положения арбитражных управляющих.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
