Abstract
Abstract The article responds to the global expansion of foreign relations law as a distinct field of research by critically scrutinizing ideologies and political projects underlying the foreign relations law. The nationalistic sentiment of foreign relations law studies has been consolidated through the production of the Fourth Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the USA. The foreign relations law is developing itself into a forcible competitor to international law. This article highlights the limits of comparative foreign relations law as well as the importance to transcend functionalism and reductionism in order to critically engage with the discipline. The article emphasizes the importance of transforming the discipline along with a modest, inclusive, and critical style.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
