Abstract
Attribution style is one of the most relevant concepts in predicting academic achievement. Various researches have tried to study the factors that influence the attribution style. Several factors such as gender, ethnicity, and social class have been widely discussed in scientific publications. However, since Bernard Weiner first developed attribution theory more than 40 years ago, there have been changes in a social condition that might have affected various attribution factors. This review aims to see the latest developments in the factors that influence the attribution of academic achievement. A systematic search of articles published in 3 English-language international publishers since 2010 identified a total of 6 studies, which included 132.293 students from various nations. An assessment that measured qualities of a research in 4 areas: research design, sampling, measurement, and analysis identified 3 high-quality research and 3 moderate-quality research. The result shows that ethnic factors confirm the findings from previous studies. Researches on gender factors provide new insights regarding the attribution style of female students. Besides, new factors emerge, such as school stratification and the attribution style of parents over their life events.
Highlights
Abstrak Gaya atribusi merupakan salah satu konsep yang paling relevan dalam memprediksi prestasi akademik
This review aims to see the latest developments in the factors that influence the attribution of academic achievement
Personal and Social Factors in Achievement-Related Cognition: A Study of Attribution, Appraisal, and Emotion among University Students in Delhi
Summary
Seleksi abstrak N=155 - Bukan bidang pendidikan N=113 - Bukan gaya atribusi pelajar N=17 - Bukan prestasi akademik N=3 - Tidak mengkaji faktor-faktor gaya atribusi prestasi akademik pada pelajar N=21 - Metaanalisis N=1. Asesmen Kualitas Penelitian Enam publikasi ilmiah yang disertakan dalam tinjuan sistematis ini kemudian dinilai kualitas metodologi penelitiannya. Setiap penelitian dapat diketahui kualitas penelitiannya berdasarkan skor total yang diperoleh. Kategori kualitas penelitian dibagi menjadi 3 (tiga), yaitu rendah (0-3), sedang (4-8), dan tinggi (9-12). Berdasarkan asesmen kualitas yang telah dijalankan, 3 (tiga) penelitian termasuk dalam kualitas tinggi, dan 3 (penelitian) diketahui mempunyai kualitas sedang. Dari keenam publikasi yang ditelaah, tidak ada satu penelitian yang mencantumkan prosedur penanganan data outlier dalam analisis statistiknya. Reliabilitas alat ukur juga menjadi kelemahan yang ditemukan pada 3 (tiga) penelitian. Kelebihan dari 6 (enam) penelitian yang disertakan antara lain angka respon yang lebih dari 60%, ukuran sampel yang memadai, serta penggunaan alat ukur yang didasarkan pada kerangka teori. Mengingat tidak ada penelitian yang berada pada kategori rendah, keenam publikasi ilmiah yang diniliai di tahap ini tetap dipertahankan ke tahap selanjutnya
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
