Abstract

Background Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not demonstrated impact on systolic recovery compared to placebo. However, recent studies suggest that timing of G-CSF therapy is crucial. Methods Timing of G-CSF treatment was analyzed in the STEMMI MRI subpopulation including 54 patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) < 12 h after symptom onset. Patients were randomized to double blind treatment with G-CSF (10 µg/kg/day) or placebo. Treatment was initiated from 17 to 65 h (mean 30) after PCI. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated with MRI. Results Recovery of LVEF from baseline to 6 months was not associated with time from PCI to G-CSF. An identical improvement in LVEF was found in the placebo group and the G-CSF group ( p = 0.8). There was no correlation between time from PCI to G-CSF and maximum plasma concentration of CD34+ cells ( r = − 0.3, p = 0.1). Similar results were found from data on recovery of the infarction size and change in the systolic wall thickening. Conclusions In the time window from 17 to 65 h after STEMI treated with PCI, the timing of G-CSF treatment does not seem to affect the recovery of LVEF. It remains to be determined if very early, or very late G-CSF treatment might be effective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.