Abstract
ABSTRACT Questions regarding the construction of mathematical authority haveimplications for learning, specifically for students’ views of themselves as mathematics learners and doers with valuable contributions. We consider the ideas proposed by eight first-grade students who had the most airtime during 12 lessons of a classroom teaching experiment.We noted when ideas were proposed and how those ideas were responded to. We observed one student, Tia, be positioned and trusted as a source of mathematical authority by their peers and found that Tia had more airtime, made more contributions, and proposed more ideas than their peers. Our theoretical contribution is the link we make between work on mathematical authority and work on epistemic trust by making sense of our findings in terms of research on fact checking and trusting inaccurate informants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
