Abstract

A comparative study of Ti and TiN [ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD)] films as diffusion barriers for Cu has been done. It is found that amorphous Ti (a-Ti) and TiN (a-TiN) films show better thermal stability than (010) oriented Ti (c-Ti) and (111) oriented TiN (c-TiN) films. Such thermal stability can be attributed to their microstructure lacking grains that are fast diffusion paths compared to the imperfect preferentially oriented films prepared by IBAD. Compared to a 300 Å amorphous TiN layer, a 600 Å c-Ti/a-TiN multilayer shows inferior thermal stability, while improvement resulting from the 600 Å a-Ti/a-TiN multilayer is observed. Reasons for these effects are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.