Abstract
Almost one third of the UK's total energy is consumed by the domestic sector. Occupancy measurement could have the potential to save significant amounts of that energy, either instantly via a home automation system or retrospectively via post-occupancy evaluation. However, not many localisation technologies are applicable to a domestic environment. In this paper three unobtrusive occupancy measuring technologies, i.e. Passive Infra-Red (PIR), Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Device-free Localisation (DfL), are compared. Their operation is explained and possible advantages and disadvantages are outlined. A qualitative experimental study then analyses the abilities of each system to detect overall occupancy, detect room level occupancy, count the number of occupants and localise them. It has been found that CO2 and PIR sensors are very limited. The impacts of other factors, such as windows or occupants’ metabolic rates, were significant on the reliability of the measured data. DfL on the other hand has great potential, but requires further research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
