Three-dimensional printing for preoperative rehearsal and intraoperative navigation during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with left colic artery preservation.
Prior studies have shown that preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer (RC) can reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL), without compromising oncological outcomes. However, anatomical variations in the branches of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and LCA present significant surgical challenges. In this study, we present our novel three dimensional (3D) printed IMA model designed to facilitate preoperative rehearsal and intraoperative navigation to analyze its impact on surgical safety. To investigate the effect of 3D IMA models on preserving the LCA during RC surgery. We retrospectively collected clinical dates from patients with RC who underwent laparoscopic radical resection from January 2022 to May 2024 at Fuyang People's Hospital. Patients were divided into the 3D printing and control groups for statistical analysis of perioperative characteristics. The 3D printing observation group comprised of 72 patients, while the control group comprised 68 patients. The operation time (174.5 ± 38.2 minutes vs 198.5 ± 49.6 minutes, P = 0.002), intraoperative blood loss (43.9 ± 31.3 mL vs 58.2 ± 30.8 mL, P = 0.005), duration of hospitalization (13.1 ± 3.1 days vs 15.9 ± 5.6 days, P < 0.001), postoperative recovery time (8.6 ± 2.6 days vs 10.5 ± 4.9 days, P = 0.007), and the postoperative complication rate (P < 0.05) were all significantly lower in the observation group. Utilization of a 3D-printed IMA model in laparoscopic radical resection of RC can assist surgeons in understanding the LCA anatomy preoperatively, thereby reducing intraoperative bleeding and shortening operating time, demonstrating better clinical application potential.
- Preprint Article
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4763568/v1
- Aug 17, 2024
Background Previous studies have shown that preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer (RC) can maintain the blood supply to the remaining colon without compromising the oncological outcomes. However, anatomical variations in the branches of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and LCA present significant surgical challenges. Here, we construct a 3D printing IMA model for preoperative rehearsal and intraoperative navigation to analyze its positive impact on surgical safety. Methods We retrospectively collected clinical dates from patients with RC who received laparoscopic radical resection from January 2022 to May 2024 at Fuyang City People's Hospital. Patients were divided into 3D printing group and control group and their perioperative characteristics were statistically analyzed. Results 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for RC were included in the study. Among them, a total of 32 patients were excluded due to exclusion criteria. Finally, observe group (3D printing group) was comprised of 72 patients, while control group consisted of 68 patients. Operating time (196.7 ± 44.5 vs. 233.3 ± 44.3 min, p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (43.9 ± 31.3 vs. 58.2 ± 30.8 ml, p = 0.005), duration of hospitalization (14.3 ± 5.1 vs. 18.7 ± 9.2 days, p < 0.001), and postoperative recovery time (9.1 ± 5.1 vs. 11.9 ± 7.1 days, p = 0.007) were significantly lower in observe group than in control group. There were no significant differences in the number of lymph node dissections, presence of lymph vessel invasion, postoperative intestinal obstruction and anastomotic leakage between the two groups. Conclusions Utilization of a 3D-printed IMA model in laparoscopic radical resection of RC can assist the surgeon in understanding the LCA anatomy preoperatively, reducing intraoperative bleeding, shortening operating time.
- Research Article
3
- 10.12669/pjms.39.1.6366
- Nov 23, 2022
- Pakistan journal of medical sciences
To investigate the effect of different treatment methods of the left colic artery (LCA) on postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Retrospective analysis was performed on 70 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer who were admitted to The Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January, 2020 to December, 2022 were selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods of LCA. The preservation group (LCA group) (n=34 cases) and the non-preservation group (NLCA group) (n=36 cases). Both groups were treated with laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. IMA was preserved in the LCA group, but not in the NLCA group. The efficacy indicators, surgical treatment and rehabilitation-related indicators, gastrointestinal hormone indicators (motilin (MTL), gastrin (GAS)), and postoperative complications risk were compared between the two groups before and after surgery. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of efficacy indicators (total number of lymph nodes dissected and number of lymph nodes at the root of the IMA), operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage tube placement time (p>0.05). However, postoperative anal flatus and hospital stay in the LCA group were considerably shorter than those in the NLCA group (p<0.05). Postoperatively, the levels of MTL and GAS in the two groups were significantly decreased, and the LCA group decreased slightly compared with the NLCA group (p<0.05). Moreover, the incidence of complications in the LCA group (5.88%) was significantly lower than that in the NLCA group (27.78%) (p<0.05). Preservation of LCA and no-preservation of LCA in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer are comparable in terms of therapeutic effect, and the surgery with preservation of LCA is worthy of clinical promotion due to its various benefits such as less impact on gastrointestinal hormone indicators, lower risk of complications, and faster postoperative recovery.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1186/s12893-024-02492-2
- Jul 4, 2024
- BMC Surgery
BackgroundThe preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) has emerged as a preferred approach in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer. However, preserving the LCA while simultaneously dissecting the NO.253 lymph node can create a mesenteric defect between the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the LCA, and the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV). This defect could act as a potential “hernia ring,” increasing the risk of developing an internal hernia after surgery. The objective of this study was to introduce a novel technique designed to mitigate the risk of internal hernia by filling mesenteric defects with autologous tissue.MethodsThis new technique was performed on eighteen patients with rectal cancer between January 2022 and June 2022. First of all, dissected the lymphatic fatty tissue on the main trunk of IMA from its origin until the LCA and sigmoid artery (SA) or superior rectal artery (SRA) were exposed and then NO.253 lymph node was dissected between the IMA, LCA and IMV. Next, the SRA or SRA and IMV were sequentially ligated and cut off at an appropriate location away from the “hernia ring” to preserve the connective tissue between the “hernia ring” and retroperitoneum. Finally, after mobilization of distal sigmoid, on the lateral side of IMV, the descending colon was mobilized cephalad. Patients’preoperative baseline characteristics and intraoperative, postoperative complications were examined.ResultsAll patients’ potential “hernia rings” were closed successfully with our new technique. The median operative time was 195 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 55 ml (interquartile range 30–90). The total harvested lymph nodes was 13.0(range12−19). The median times to first flatus and liquid diet intake were both 3.0 days. The median number of postoperative hospital days was 8.0 days. One patient had an injury to marginal arterial arch, and after mobolization of splenic region, tension-free anastomosis was achieved. No other severe postoperative complications such as abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage, or bleeding were observed.ConclusionsThis technique is both safe and effective for filling the mesenteric defect, potentially reducing the risk of internal hernia following laparoscopic NO.253 lymph node dissection and preservation of the left colic artery in rectal cancer surgeries.
- Research Article
43
- 10.3748/wjg.v24.i32.3671
- Aug 28, 2018
- World Journal of Gastroenterology
AIMTo investigate the vascular anatomy of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in laparoscopic radical resection with the preservation of left colic artery (LCA) for rectal cancer.METHODSA total of 110 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgical resection with preservation of the LCA were retrospectively reviewed. A 3D vascular reconstruction was performed before each surgical procedure to assess the branches of the IMA. During surgery, the relationship among the IMA, LCA, sigmoid artery (SA) and superior rectal artery (SRA) was evaluated, and the length from the origin of the IMA to the point of branching into the LCA or common trunk of LCA and SA was measured. The relationship between inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and LCA was also evaluated.RESULTSThree vascular types were identified in this study. In type A, LCA arose independently from IMA (46.4%, n = 51); in type B, LCA and SA branched from a common trunk of the IMA (23.6%, n = 26); and in type C, LCA, SA, and SRA branched at the same location (30.0%, n = 33). The difference in the length from the origin of IMA to LCA was not statistically significant among the three types. LCA was located under the IMV in 61 cases and above the IMV in 49 cases.CONCLUSIONThe vascular anatomy of the IMA and IMV is essential for laparoscopic radical resection with preservation of the LCA for rectal cancer. To recognize different branches of the IMA is necessary for the resection of lymph nodes and dissection of vessels.
- Research Article
5
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2017.06.014
- Jun 25, 2017
- Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
To investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma with preservation of the left colic artery(LCA). Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 322 cases with rectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection in Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2007 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), cases were divided into the trial group (LCA preservation plus lymph nodes around IMA root dissection, 168 cases) and the control group(origin of IMA ligation, 154 cases). The 5-year rates of disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) were compared between two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The follow-up rate was 91.1%(153/168) during 5-60 months in the trial group, and 90.3%(139/154) during 6-60 months in the control group. The number of patients who developed death, local recurrence and metastasis were 49(32.0%), 9(5.9%) and 62(40.5%) in the trial group, and 44(31.7%), 9(6.5%) and 52(37.4%) in the control group, respectively, without significant differences(all P>0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 57.2% and 69.5% in the trial group, and 59.7% and 70.1% in the control group, and the differences were not significant between the two groups(all P>0.05). After stratification by TNM stage, the 5-year DFS rates of I( stage, II( stage and III( stage were 80.4%, 62.5% and 45.1% in the trial group, and 82.6%, 66.0% and 48.8% in the control group; the 5-year OS rates of I( stage, II( stage and III( stage were 90.2%, 76.2% and 56.7% in the trial group, and 94.4%, 74.3% and 60.5% in the control group, respectively, and the differences were not significant as well (all P>0.05). The long-term outcomes after laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma with preservation of LCA and dissection of lymph nodes around root of IMA are comparable with ligation at origin of IMA.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1038/s41598-024-79713-4
- Nov 15, 2024
- Scientific Reports
The preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) during rectal cancer resection remains a topic of controversy, and there is a notable absence of robust evidence regarding the outcomes associated with LCA preservation. And the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) surgery in rectal resection remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of LCA preservation surgery and RAL surgery on intraoperative and postoperative complications of rectal cancer resection. Patients who underwent laparoscopic (LSC) or RAL with or without LCA preservation resection for rectal cancer between April 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: low ligation (LL) which with preservation of LCA and high ligation (HL) which without preservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was operative findings, operative morbidity, and postoperative genitourinary function. A total of 612 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 139 patients in each group. The blood loss of the LL group was significantly less than that of the HL group (54.42 ± 12.99 mL vs. 65.71 ± 7.37 mL, p<0.001). The urinary catheter withdrawal time in the LL group was significantly shorter than that in the HL group (4.87 ± 2.04 d vs. 6.06 ± 2.43d, p<0.001). Anastomotic leakage in the LL group was significantly lower than that in HL group (1.44% vs. 7.91%, p = 0.011). The rate of urinary dysfunction and sexual dysfunction in LL group is both significantly lower than HL group. Blood loss and number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) of both RAL subgroups in LL and HL groups were significantly more than that in LSC subgroups. The anastomotic leakage in the RAL subgroup of HL group was significantly lower than that in LSC subgroup (0% vs. 14.89%, p = 0.018). LCA preservation surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the blood loss, urinary catheter withdrawal time, the rate of anastomotic leakage and ileus, and postoperative genitourinary function outcomes. RAL can reduce the probability of blood loss and improve harvest LNs in patients with rectal cancer.
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101009
- Jun 19, 2024
- Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Constructing a personalized nomogram model for predicting anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer
- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/ags3.12869
- Oct 11, 2024
- Annals of gastroenterological surgery
We investigated how Japanese D3 dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation affects anastomotic leakage after anterior resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer, based on the leak rate. The correlation between LCA preservation, survival, and cancer recurrence after resection was also analyzed. It remains unclear how LCA preservation affects the anastomotic leak rate and oncological outcomes after resection remains unclear. Some reports suggested that anastomotic leakage increases local recurrence and decreases cancer-specific survival. In this study, we enrolled and analyzed 457 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer in the period October 2011 through December 2016. The attending surgeon decided preoperatively and registered whether to preserve the LCA. This trial was registered under the UMIN-CTR Identifier UMIN000006160. D3 with LCA preservation was successfully completed in 218 (89.3%) of the 244 patients registered in this group, whereas D3 without LCA preservation was successfully completed in all 213 patients registered in this group. After propensity score matching, the anastomotic leakage rate was 7.86% (11/140) after D3 with LCA preservation and 7.14% (10/140) after D3 without LCA preservation. The overall survival rates were 90.1% and 89.3%, and the recurrence-free survival rates were 77.6% and 77.3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that LCA preservation has no effect on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with anastomosis using DST and that oncological outcomes may not be affected.
- Research Article
7
- 10.1186/s12957-023-02964-4
- Mar 6, 2023
- World Journal of Surgical Oncology
BackgroundD3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation in rectal cancer surgery seems to have little effect on reducing postoperative anastomotic leakage. So we first propose D3 lymph node dissection with LCA and first sigmoid artery (SA) preservation. This novel procedure deserves further study.MethodsRectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation or with LCA and first SA preservation between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: the preservation of the LCA group and the preservation of the LCA and first SA group. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding.ResultsPropensity score matching yielded 56 patients in each group from the eligible patients. The rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage in the preservation of the LCA and first SA group was significantly lower than that in the LCA preservation group (7.1% vs. 0%, P=0.040). No significant differences were observed in operation time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, length of distal margin, lymph node retrieval, apical lymph node retrieval, and complications. A survival analysis showed patients’ 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of group 1 and group 2 were 81.8% and 83.5% (P=0.595), respectively.ConclusionD3 lymph node dissection with LCA and first SA preservation for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without compromising oncological outcomes compare with D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation alone.
- Research Article
2
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631x.2018.07.009
- Jul 25, 2018
- Zhonghua putong waike zazhi
Objective To evaluate the surgical complications and root vascular lymph node dissection by high versus low ligation the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) retaining left colonic artery (LCA) in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods Clinical data of 357 cases of rectal cancer in our center from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, were retrospectively analyzed, including 247 cases in high ligation group, 110 cases of low ligation group. Results There was no statistically significant difference in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups [(105±10)min vs. (113±9)min, t=0.138, P=0.092; (96±21)ml vs. (99±23)ml, t=0.171, P=0.118]. Nor that in the incidence of anastomotic leakage between the two groups (7.3% vs. 4.5%, χ2=0.949, P=0.330). The incidence of low anterior resection syndrome in the two groups was statistically significant (21% vs. 12%, χ2=4.358, P=0.037). There was no significant difference in the total number of lymph nodes dissected between the two groups ([(14.5±4.3) vs. (13.6±3.5), t=1.851, P=0.065]. Conclusion Low ligation of IMA with preservation of LCA in laparoscopic radical operation for rectal cancer provides better blood supply for proximal colon, while achieving same radical clearance of lymph nodes as with high ligation of IMA. Key words: Rectal neoplasms; Mesenteric artery, inferior; Left colic artery
- Research Article
2
- 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210205-00067
- Jun 1, 2021
- Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]
Objective: To examine the safety and effectiveness of a novel stent assisted intestinal bypass for preventing anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 9 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection and stent assisted intestinal bypass from September 2019 to June 2020 at the Department of Anus & Intestine Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University were retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 males and 3 females, aged (62.1±6.8) years (range: 53 to 75 years), underwent laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer and stent assisted intestinal bypass. A degradable diverting stent was placed at the end of the ileum, and a drainage tube was placed at the proximal end of the stent to bypass the intestinal contents. After operation, the patients were given a diet with less residue. From the 14th day after operation, abdomen X-ray films were taken every 5 to 7 days to observe the destination of the stent dynamically. When the stent was observed to be disintegrated into pieces, the drainage tube was clamped for 3 days to observe any side effects before the tube was removed. The operation time, the time of removing the bypass tube and the total hospital stay were recorded. Results: Laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer and stent assisted intestinal bypass were successfully performed in all patients. The operation time was (230.4±48.0) minutes (range: 150 to 318 minutes), and the time of removing shunt tube was (28.8±4.6) days (range: 22 to 34 days). The duration of hospitalization was (21.0±8.6) days (range: 9 to 34 days). Postoperative pathological examination showed 7 cases of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 1 case of moderately well differentiated adenocarcinoma and 1 case of mucinous adenocarcinoma. There were 2 cases of T1, 4 cases of T2 and 3 cases of T3. The number of lymph node dissection was 13.4±3.5 (range: 6 to 18), 3 cases were positive and 6 cases were negative. The post-operation follow-up time was 6 to 16 months, no anastomotic leakage or stenosis was found. Conclusion: Stent assisted intestinal bypass for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer is safe and feasible, and shows good short-term effect.
- Research Article
10
- 10.3892/mco.2018.1714
- Sep 7, 2018
- Molecular and Clinical Oncology
The aim of the present meta-analysis compared left colic artery (LCA) preservation with non-preservation in laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer in terms of feasibility, efficacy and safety. The PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched prior to June 2017 for studies comparing LCA preservation and non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Two researchers screened the literature independently, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias. The study was performed using RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis. A total of 10 studies comparing LCA preservation and non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were selected for this meta-analysis, with a combined study population of 1,471 patients. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that, when comparing LCA preservation with non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (P<0.01), estimated blood loss (P<0.01), percentage of neostomy (P<0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P<0.01), time to first postoperative exhaust (P<0.01) and amount of anastomotic leakage (P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (P=0.28), incidence of recurrence (P=0.73) and incidence of metastasis (P=0.52). Therefore, compared with LCA non-preservation, patients in whom the LCA was preserved during laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer had a better prognosis. However, there was no difference in recurrence or metastasis between the two groups. Although the operative time and estimated blood loss were increased with LCA preservation, these may be reduced with improving proficiency of the operating surgeons. The conclusions of the present study require verification by larger samples and high-quality randomized controlled trials.
- Research Article
2
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2017.11.013
- Nov 25, 2017
- Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
To demonstrate the clinical applicability of three-dimensional CT angiography by evaluating the anatomic features and variation of inferior mesenteric artery(IMA) and left colic artery(LCA) in order to provide reference to vessel ligation strategy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Clinical and image data of 123 patients receiving abdominal multislice CT at The Sixth Affiliated Hospital from 2014 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The images were 3D-reconstructed with computer 3D CT angiography and arterial enhancement phase images were chosen for analysis. Linear distances from IMA root to abdominal aortic bifurcation and from LCA at IMA root level to IMA root were measured. Branch types of IMA, coursing pattern of LCA, and association between LCA and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) site were summarized. Of 123 cases, 80 were males and 43 were females, mean age was (46.8±16.6) years, body weight was (57.7±10.4) kg, and BMI was (21.3±3.6) kg/m2. The average distance from IMA root to abdominal aortic bifurcation was (42.5±7.9) mm, and this distance was closely associated with body weight (OR=4.771, 95%CI: 1.398 to 16.283, P=0.013). Longer distance tended to appear in the heavier patients. LCA and sigmoid artery (SA) originating from same single IMA was found in 61(49.6%) cases; LCA and SA forking at same point in 35(28.5%) cases; LCA and SA coursing together and forking afterwards in 24(19.5%) cases, and LCA disappearing in 3(2.4%) cases. In 71(57.7%) patients, LCA ascended medial to the lateral border of left kidney, while in 16(13.0%) patients, LCA arranged below the inferior border of left kidney. When the LCA site was higher and the distance from LCA to IMA root was closer [distance from LCA to IMA root level was (24.2±9.9) mm, (30.0±15.2) mm and (66.6±12.3) mm, F=83.2, P<0.001]. At the level of IMA root, LCA located medial to IMV in 21(17.1%) cases, located just lateral to IMV in 54(43.9%) cases, and located lateral and ascended far away from IMV in 48(39.0%) cases. 3D-CT angiography is non-invasive, efficient and accurate in evaluating coursing features and variation of IMA and its branches, which can provide important reference to the surgeons, promising laparoscopic surgery smooth and safe.
- Research Article
8
- 10.3389/fonc.2023.1195404
- Jun 19, 2023
- Frontiers in Oncology
To investigate the application value of a three-dimensional (3D) printed pelvic model in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery in The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City from May 2020 to April 2022 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into general imaging examination group (control group, n=25) and 3D printing group (observation group, n=25) by random number table method, and the perioperative situation of patients in the two groups was compared. There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (p>0.05). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative time to locate inferior mesenteric artery, intraoperative time to locate left colic artery, first postoperative exhaust time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); There were no significant differences in the total number of lymph nodes and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The application of 3D printed pelvic model in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer is conducive to understanding pelvic structure and mesenteric vascular anatomy, reducing intraoperative bleeding and shortening operation time, which is worthy of further clinical application.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1186/s12957-022-02762-4
- Sep 12, 2022
- World Journal of Surgical Oncology
ObjectivesAn investigation of the effects of different types of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) on laparoscopic left colic artery (LCA) radical resection of rectal cancer was conducted.MethodsClinical data were collected from 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the LCA at Nantong University’s Second Affiliated Hospital. All patients underwent full-abdominal dual-energy CT enhancement examination before surgery and 3D post-processing reconstruction of the IMA. Two radiologists with >3 years of experience in abdominal radiology jointly conducted the examination. A total of three types of IMA were identified among the patients: IMA type I (the LCA arising independently from the IMA), type II (LCA and sigmoid colon artery [SA] branching from a common trunk from IMA), and type III (LCA, SA, and superior rectal artery [SRA] branching from the IMA at the same point). The baseline data, pathological results, and intra-operative and post-operative indicators of the groups were analyzed.ResultsThe proportions of type I, type II, and type III IMA were 58.70% (54/92), 18.48% (17/92), and 22.82% (21/92), respectively. IMA typing was consistent with the preoperative CT evaluation results. The intra-operative blood loss of type III IMA patients [median (interquartile spacing), M (P25, P75): 52.00 (39.50, 68.50) ml] was higher than that of type I and II IMA patients [35.00 (24.00, 42.00) and 32.00 (25.50, 39.50) ml, respectively] (P<0.05). The incidence of anastomotic fistula in type III IMA patients (4 cases, 19.05%) was higher than that in non-type III IMA patients (1 case, 1.41%) (X2=6.679, P=0.010). The incidence of postoperative complications among the three types of IMA was not significantly different (P>0.05).ConclusionsAmong rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic LCA preservation, type III IMA patients had more intraoperative bleeding and a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula. However, this did not increase the risk of overall postoperative complications.