Abstract

Limited overall efficiency and excessive complexity can hinder the competitiveness of biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell micro combined heat and power systems. To overcome these problems, hydrocarbons direct internal reforming is analysed as a strategy to increase efficiency and reduce system complexity. To the same end, two biosyngas heating-up strategies are compared: catalytic partial oxidation and afterburner off gases utilization. A comprehensive approach combining thermodynamic equilibrium calculations, experimental measurements, and system modelling was used. The gas cleaning unit should operate at 400 °C to decrease H2S and HCl below 1 ppmv. A tar amount of 120–130 g Nm−3 dry biosyngas for woodchips and 190 g Nm−3 for straw pellets was measured and 2-methoxyphenol, hydroxyacetic acid and hydroxyacetone were selected as representative compounds. With direct internal reforming the cathode air flow rate decreases from approximately 90 kg h−1 to 60 kg h−1. This leads to an increase of around 1% point in electrical efficiency and of even 5–6% points in thermal efficiency. Direct internal tar reforming seems therefore an advantageous strategy. The catalytic partial oxidation unit increases the system overall efficiency but reduces the electric efficiency from roughly 38%–30% and is therefore not advised.

Highlights

  • Combining biomass gasification with high temperature fuel cells has received considerable attention as an alternative to fossil fuel based energy systems [1e4]

  • In a biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system, the biomass is converted into biosyngas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and methane, which is converted into heat and electricity in the SOFC

  • Before entering the SOFC, the gas passes through a gas cleaning unit (GCU) where the contaminants are removed at low (

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Combining biomass gasification with high temperature fuel cells has received considerable attention as an alternative to fossil fuel based energy systems [1e4]. Biosyngas contains minor compounds which are harmful for downstream equipment and have to be removed: sulphur, halides, particulate matter and tar compounds [5]. The biosyngas composition and the content of tar are highly dependent on the gasification agent used, that can be air, oxygen, or steam [6]. Before entering the SOFC, the gas passes through a gas cleaning unit (GCU) where the contaminants are removed at low (

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.