Therapeutic potential of biased μ-opioid receptor agonists for delaying opioid tolerance in chronic pain management.

Issues in Long-term Opioid Therapy: Unmet Needs, Risks, and Solutions

Grand opening of structure-guided design for novel opioids

Opioids for the treatment of acute pain and the pain of malignancy have been strongly encouraged for more than 25 years.1 In the past 2 decades, the treatment of chronic noncancer pain using long-term opioid therapy has become more common. However, recent studies have revealed the astonishing rapidi

GPCRs (G-Protein-Coupled Receptors) as Microprocessors: Focus on the AT1R (Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor).

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors and signal through the proximal effectors, G proteins and β-arrestins, to influence nearly every biological process. The G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways have largely been considered separable; however, direct interactions between Gα proteins and β-arrestins have been described that appear to be part of a distinct GPCR signaling pathway. Within these complexes, Gαi/o, but not other Gα protein subtypes, directly interacts with β-arrestin, regardless of the canonical Gα protein that is coupled to the GPCR. Here, we report that the endogenous biased chemokine agonists of CXCR3 (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), together with two small-molecule biased agonists, differentially formed Gαi:β-arrestin complexes. Formation of the Gαi:β-arrestin complexes did not correlate well with either G protein activation or β-arrestin recruitment. β-arrestin biosensors demonstrated that ligands that promoted Gαi:β-arrestin complex formation generated similar β-arrestin conformations. We also found that Gαi:β-arrestin complexes did not couple to the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK, as is observed with other receptors such as the V2 vasopressin receptor, but did couple with the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2, which suggests context-dependent signaling by these complexes. These findings reinforce the notion that Gαi:β-arrestin complex formation is a distinct GPCR signaling pathway and enhance our understanding of the spectrum of biased agonism.

Opioid analgesics are essential in the management of severe and chronic pain; however, their prolonged use is limited by the onset of analgesic tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Recent studies increasingly implicate both synaptic functional and structural plasticity within nociceptive pathways as crucial mechanisms in OIH and tolerance. This review integrates current mechanistic understanding of how opioids alter synaptic transmission throughout the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal dorsal horn, and supraspinal nociceptive networks. Peripherally, μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activation on TRPV1-positive nociceptors initiates presynaptic long-term potentiation (LTP), forming an early substrate for central sensitization. In the spinal dorsal horn, chronic opioid exposure drives NMDAR-dependent LTP, TRPC-mediated calcium influx, and actin cytoskeleton remodeling, leading to persistent increases in synaptic strength and excitatory connectivity. In supraspinal regions-including the ventral hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala-opioids promote experience-dependent plasticity and predictive coding, which link environmental cues to reduced analgesic effectiveness. In addition to synaptic functional plasticity, opioid-induced synaptic structural plasticity within nociceptive pathways has been shown to underlie the long-term nature of opioid analgesic tolerance. Collectively, these data define a distributed network of opioid-responsive synapses whose pathological potentiation underpins the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia. Elucidating these mechanisms underlying OIH and tolerance paves the way for targeted therapeutic strategies that maintain analgesic efficacy while minimizing adverse synaptic remodeling and negative outcomes.

Beyond the needle: expanding the role of anesthesiologists in the management of chronic non-malignant pain.

Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors describes the phenomenon whereby some drugs can activate some downstream signaling activities to the relative exclusion of others. Descriptions of biased agonism focusing on the differential engagement of G proteins versus β-arrestins are commonly limited by the small response windows obtained in pathways that are not amplified or are less effectively coupled to receptor engagement, such as β-arrestin recruitment. At the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), G protein-biased ligands have been proposed to induce less constipation and respiratory depressant side effects than opioids commonly used to treat pain. However, it is unclear whether these improved safety profiles are due to a reduction in β-arrestin-mediated signaling or, alternatively, to their low intrinsic efficacy in all signaling pathways. Here, we systematically evaluated the most recent and promising MOR-biased ligands and assessed their pharmacological profile against existing opioid analgesics in assays not confounded by limited signal windows. We found that oliceridine, PZM21, and SR-17018 had low intrinsic efficacy. We also demonstrated a strong correlation between measures of efficacy for receptor activation, G protein coupling, and β-arrestin recruitment for all tested ligands. By measuring the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of these ligands, we showed that the low intrinsic efficacy of opioid ligands can explain an improved side effect profile. Our results suggest a possible alternative mechanism underlying the improved therapeutic windows described for new opioid ligands, which should be taken into account for future descriptions of ligand action at this important therapeutic target.

Medicinal plants used in the management of chronic joint pains in Machakos and Makueni counties, Kenya

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been known as receptors that activate G protein-dependent cellular signaling pathways. In addition to the G protein-dependent pathways, recent reports have revealed that several ligands called "biased ligands" elicit G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling through GPCRs (biased agonism). Several β-blockers are known as biased ligands. All β-blockers inhibit the binding of agonists to the β-adrenergic receptors. In addition to β-blocking action, some β-blockers are reported to induce cellular responses through G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. However, the physiological significance induced by the β-arrestin-dependent pathway remains much to be clarified in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that metoprolol, a β(1)-adrenergic receptor-selective blocker, could induce cardiac fibrosis through a G protein-independent and β-arrestin2-dependent pathway. Metoprolol, a β-blocker, increased the expression of fibrotic genes responsible for cardiac fibrosis in cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, metoprolol induced the interaction between β(1)-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2, but not β-arrestin1. The interaction between β(1)-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2 by metoprolol was impaired in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5)-knockdown cells. Metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis led to cardiac dysfunction. However, the metoprolol-induced fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction were not evoked in β-arrestin2- or GRK5-knock-out mice. Thus, metoprolol is a biased ligand that selectively activates a G protein-independent and GRK5/β-arrestin2-dependent pathway, and induces cardiac fibrosis. This study demonstrates the physiological importance of biased agonism, and suggests that G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling is a reason for the diversity of the effectiveness of β-blockers.

Based on the conformationally constrained D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp (wFw) core of the prototype inverse agonist [D-Arg(1),D-Phe(5),D-Trp(7,9),Leu(11)]substance P, a series of novel, small, peptide-mimetic agonists for the ghrelin receptor were generated. By using various simple, ring-constrained spacers connecting the D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp motif with the important C-terminal carboxyamide group, 40 nm agonism potency was obtained and also in one case (wFw-Isn-NH(2), where Isn is isonipecotic acid) ~80% efficacy. However, in contrast to all previously reported ghrelin receptor agonists, the piperidine-constrained wFw-Isn-NH(2) was found to be a functionally biased agonist. Thus, wFw-Isn-NH(2) mediated potent and efficacious signaling through the Gα(q) and ERK1/2 signaling pathways, but in contrast to all previous ghrelin receptor agonists it did not signal through the serum response element, conceivably the Gα(12/13) pathway. The recognition pattern of wFw-Isn-NH(2) with the ghrelin receptor also differed significantly from that of all previously characterized unbiased agonists. Most importantly, wFw-Isn-NH(2) was not dependent on GluIII:09 (Glu3.33), which otherwise is an obligatory TM III anchor point residue for ghrelin agonists. Molecular modeling and docking experiments indicated that wFw-Isn-NH(2) binds in the classical agonist binding site between the extracellular segments of TMs III, VI, and VII, interacting closely with the aromatic cluster between TMs VI and VII, but that it does so in an opposite orientation as compared with, for example, the wFw peptide agonists. It is concluded that the novel peptide-mimetic ligand wFw-Isn-NH(2) is a biased ghrelin receptor agonist and that the selective signaling pattern presumably is due to its unique receptor recognition pattern lacking interaction with key residues especially in TM III.

Distinct pharmacological properties of morphine metabolites at G i-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways activated by the human μ-opioid receptor

A persistent pain

Biased agonists differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles in Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

The opioid crisis is a major threat of the 21st century, with a remarkable juxtaposition of use and abuse. Opioids are the most potent and efficacious class of analgesics, but despite their proven therapeutic efficacy, they have recently been degraded to third-line therapy for the management of chronic pain in clinics. The reason behind this is the development of potential side effects and tolerance after repeated dosing. Opioid tolerance is the major limiting factor leading to the withdrawal of treatment, severe side effects due to dose escalation, and sometimes even death of the patients. Every day more than 90 people die due to opioids overdose in America, and a similar trend has been seen across the globe. Over the past two decades, researchers have been trying to dissect the neurobiological mechanism of opioid tolerance. Research on opioid tolerance shifted toward central nervous system-based adaptations because tolerance is much more than just a cellular phenomenon. Thus, neurobiological adaptations associated with opioid tolerance are important to understand in order to find newer pain therapeutics. These adaptations are associated with alterations in ascending and descending pain pathways, reward circuitry modulations, receptor desensitization and down-regulation, receptor internalization, heterodimerization, and altered epigenetic regulation. The present Review is focused on novel circuitries associated with opioid tolerance in different areas of the brain, such as periaqueductal gray, rostral ventromedial medulla, dorsal raphe nucleus, ventral tegmental area, and nucleus accumbens. Understanding the neurobiological modulations associated with chronic opioid exposure and tolerance will pave the way for the development of novel pharmacological tools for safer and better management of chronic pain in patients.