Abstract
Avoided crossings between quasidegenerate rovibrational states in the Doppler-free two-photon excitation of the 141 mode in the S1 excited state of benzene are treated theoretically. Two sets of avoided crossings in plots of spectral line frequency vs J at a given K and ΔK have been reported experimentally between an initially prepared ‘‘light’’ state (141 in zeroth order) and dark states, namely, one which in zeroth order is a 51101161 state, the other being in zeroth order a 62111 and/or possibly a 31161 state, implicated earlier by Neusser et al. The identification of these states makes the phenomenon an excellent candidate for treatment of the avoided crossing via a Van Vleck transformation, no other basis set states being needed for the diagonalization in order to extract the important features. Two successive transformations are used for handling direct coupling and coupling via virtual states. The dominant calculated contribution to the coupling is, jointly, Coriolis plus cubic–cubic anharmonic interactions between vibrational modes. Playing less of a role are Coriolis terms in which the inverse moment of inertia tensor is expanded up to quadratic terms in the coordinates. There results a 5×5 (for coupling to 51101161 ) and a 3×3 (for coupling to 62111 or 31161 ) matrix of the transformed Hamiltonian, each of which can also be described, if desired, to a very good approximation by a 2×2 matrix. The coupling element V0 and the difference of the rotational constants for the light and dark states (ΔB) are obtained from the plots of line position vs J(J+1) obtained. For the 141 to 51101161 and for the 141 to 62111 couplings the theoretical results are in reasonable agreement with the experimental results, no adjustable parameters being employed. For a coupling of 141 to 31161 the calculated V0 would be much too high compared with experiment (a factor of 10), the coupling involving the exchange of only three instead of four vibrational quanta. A situation in which the 141 state is coupled to the 62111 state to yield an avoided crossing and off-resonantly coupled to the 31161 state would be consistent with some experimental results and not affect the reasonable agreement of the slope difference and splitting for the avoided crossing plots.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.