Abstract

The geometries and the bonding properties have been predicted for cyclic GaO2 and GaS2 species at density functional theory (DFT), MPn (n=2,3,4 with different substitutions), QCISD(T), and CCSD(T) all-electron correlation levels with 6-311+G* basis set. The geometrical optimizations and the harmonic vibrational frequency analysis are performed using DFT and second-order Møller–Plesset (MP2) methods. The relevant energy quantities are also calibrated at the high-order electron correlation levels [MP3, MP4, quadratic configuration interaction (QCI), and coupled cluster (CC)]. Each species possesses a 2A2 ground state with a higher energy level 2A1 state. The corresponding state–state separations are about 32 kcal/mol for GaO2 species and about 20 kcal/mol for GaS2 species at the QCISD(T)/6-311+G* level. The QCISD(T) and CCSD(T) calculations yield dissociation energies of 42.0 and 59.0 kcal/mol for two species, respectively, and other methods yield dissociation energies within ∼5 kcal/mol. Result analysis has indicated that the cyclic GaO2 should be classified as superoxide and the GaS2 species should be classified as supersulfide in their ground state, and those in the excited state (2A1) should not be. However, the cyclic GaS2 (2A2) is less ionic than the GaO2 (2A2) and they are far less ionic than NaO2. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 81: 222–231, 2001

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.