Abstract

Increasing permeability of disciplinary boundaries results in the theoretical and conceptual mobilities among different disciplines. Architectural theory has a unique position within these transactions since it transformed into an ever-expanding knowledge terrain via interdisciplinary perspectives. By undertaking different modes of appropriations in the architecture-media relationship, this study aims to disclose the directions and extents of these transactions. Hence, from the vast literature on the subject, specific studies are selected by considering the impact on the field, originality of approach and representation capacity of a shared perspective. These are examined via Michael Ostwald's model, composed of uni-directional, hybridization and multidirectional appropriation modes. The study found that architecture predominantly engages with media in the uni-directional mode and expands its knowledge domain. Although hybridization is not observed as diversely as uni-directional appropriation, it manifests a certain level of profoundness where these fields take almost interchangeable positions. Lastly, in multidirectional appropriation, architectural theory and media theory are seen to intertwine preeminently. The study concludes that it might be the shared origin of two knowledge fields as revealed in the concepts of extension/prosthesis that underlie the convenience of these conceptual transactions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.