Abstract

Pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques provide a noninvasive method of obtaining qualitative and quantitative perfusion images with MRI. ASL techniques employ inversion recovery and/or saturation recovery to induce perfusion weighting, and thus the performance of these techniques is dependent on the slice profiles of the inversion or saturation pulses. This article systematically examines through simulations the effects of slice profile imperfections on the perfusion signal for nine labeling schemes, including FAIR, FAIRER, and EST (UNFAIR). Each sequence is evaluated for quantitative accuracy, suppression of stationary signal, and magnitude of perfusion signal. Perfusion effects are modeled from a modified Bloch equation and experimentally determined slice profiles. The results show that FAIR, FAIRER, and EST have excellent tissue suppression. The magnitude of the perfusion signal is comparable for FAIR and FAIRER, with EST providing a slightly weaker signal. For quantitative measurements, all three methods underestimate the perfusion signal by more than 20%. Of the additional six ASL techniques examined, only one performed well in this model. This method, which combines inversion and saturation recovery, yields improved signal accuracy (<15% difference from the theoretical value) and tissue suppression similar to that of FAIR and its variants, but has only half the signal. Magn Reson Med 46:141-148, 2001.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.