The Zinc Finger Protein Znf281 Is Essential for the Formation of Neural Tissue in Xenopus Embryos

Members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) family transmit signals from membrane to nucleus via intracellular proteins known as Smads. A subclass of Smad proteins has recently been identified that antagonize, rather than transduce, TGF-beta family signals. Smad7, for example, binds to and inhibits signaling downstream of TGF-beta receptors. Here we report that the C-terminal MAD homology domain of murine Smad7 (mSmad7) is sufficient for both of these activities. In addition, we show that mSmad7 interacts with activated bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptors (BMPR-Is), inhibits BMPR-I-mediated Smad phosphorylation, and phenocopies the effect of known BMP antagonists when overexpressed in ventral cells of Xenopus embryos. Xenopus Smad7 (XSmad7, previously termed Smad8) and mSmad7 are nearly identical within their bioactive C-domain, but have quite distinct N-domains. We found that XSmad7, similar to mSmad7, interacted with BMP and TGF-beta type I receptors and inhibited receptor-mediated phosphorylation of downstream signal-transducing Smads. However, XSmad7 is a less efficient inhibitor of TbetaR-I-mediated responses in mammalian cells than is mSmad7. Furthermore, overexpression of XSmad7 in Xenopus embryos produces patterning defects that are not observed following overexpression of mSmad7, suggesting that mSmad7 and XSmad7 may preferentially target distinct signaling pathways. Our results are consistent with the possibility that the C-domain of antagonistic Smads is an effector domain whereas the N-domain may confer specificity for distinct signaling pathways.

Cellular competence is defined as a cell's ability to respond to signaling cues as a function of time. In Xenopus laevis, cellular responsiveness to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) changes during development. At blastula stages, FGF induces mesoderm, but at gastrula stages FGF regulates neuroectoderm formation. A Xenopus Oct3/4 homologue gene, XLPOU91, regulates mesoderm to neuroectoderm transitions. Ectopic XLPOU91 expression in Xenopus embryos inhibits FGF induction of Brachyury (Xbra), eliminating mesoderm, whereas neural induction is unaffected. XLPOU91 knockdown induces high levels of Xbra expression, with blastopore closure being delayed to later neurula stages. In morphant ectoderm explants, mesoderm responsiveness to FGF is extended from blastula to gastrula stages. The initial expression of mesoderm and endoderm markers is normal, but neural induction is abolished. Churchill (chch) and Sip1, two genes regulating neural competence, are not expressed in XLPOU91 morphant embryos. Ectopic Sip1 or chch expression rescues the morphant phenotype. Thus, XLPOU91 epistatically lies upstream of chch/Sip1 gene expression, regulating the competence transition that is critical for neural induction. In the absence of XLPOU91 activity, the cues driving proper embryonic cell fates are lost.

Vertebrate Embryonic Cells Will Become Nerve Cells Unless Told Otherwise

Neural induction and patterning in vertebrates are regulated during early development by several morphogens, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). Ventral ectoderm differentiates into epidermis in response to BMPs, whereas BMP signaling is tightly inhibited in the dorsal ectoderm which develops into neural tissues. Here, we show that Cdc2-like kinase 2 (Clk2) promotes early neural development and inhibits epidermis differentiation in Xenopus embryos. clk2 is specifically expressed in neural tissues along the anterior-posterior axis during early Xenopus embryogenesis. When overexpressed in ectodermal explants, Clk2 induces the expression of both anterior and posterior neural marker genes. In agreement with this observation, overexpression of Clk2 in whole embryos expands the neural plate at the expense of epidermal ectoderm. Interestingly, the neural-inducing activity of Clk2 is increased following BMP inhibition and activation of the FGF signaling pathway in ectodermal explants. Clk2 also downregulates the level of p-Smad1/5/8 in cooperation with BMP inhibition, in addition to increasing the level of activated MAPK together with FGF. These results suggest that Clk2 plays a role in early neural development of Xenopus possibly via modulation of morphogen signals such as the BMP and FGF pathways.

Cells develop by reading mixed signals. Nowhere is this clearer than in the highly dynamic processes that propel embryogenesis, when critical cell-fate decisions are made swiftly in response to well-orchestrated growthfactor combinations. Learning how diverse signaling pathways are integrated is therefore essential for understanding physiology. This requires the identification, in tangible molecular terms, of key nodes for pathway integration that operate in vivo. A report in this issue, on the integration of Smad and Ras/MAPK pathways during neural induction (Pera et al. 2003), provides timely insights into the relevance of one such node. Pera et al. (2003) report that FGF8 and IGF2—two growth factors that activate the Ras/MAPK pathway— favor neural differentiation and mesoderm dorsalization in Xenopus by inhibiting BMP (Bone Morphogenetic Protein) signaling. Mesoderm is formed from ectoderm in response to Nodal-related signals from the endoderm at the blastula stage and beyond (Fig. 1; for review, see De Robertis et al. 2000). BMP induces differentiation of ectoderm into epidermal cell fates at the expense of neural fates, and it ventralizes the mesoderm at the expense of dorsal fates (for review, see Weinstein and HemmatiBrivanlou 1999; De Robertis et al. 2000). Accordingly, neural differentiation and dorsal mesoderm formation are favored when BMP signaling is attenuated. Noggin, Chordin, Cerberus, and Follistatin, secreted by the Spemann organizer on the dorsal side at the gastrula stage, facilitate the formation of neural tissue by sequestering BMP (Weinstein and Hemmati-Brivanlou 1999; De Robertis et al. 2000). Experimentally blocking BMP signaling with a dominant-negative BMP receptor has a similar effect of promoting ectoderm neuralization (Weinstein and Hemmati-Brivanlou 1999). As it turns out, neural induction can also be achieved with FGF (fibroblast growth factor; Kengaku and Okamoto 1993; Lamb and Harland 1995; Hongo et al. 1999; Hardcastle et al. 2000; Streit et al. 2000; Wilson et al. 2000) and IGF (insulin-like growth factor; Pera et al. 2001; Richard-Parpaillon et al. 2002). Injection of transcripts encoding FGF8 or IFG2 into one animal-pole blastomere of a fourto eight-cell embryo results in an expanded neural plate at the injected side (Pera et al. 2003). Surprisingly, expression of a dominant-negative FGF receptor prevents neuralization of ectoderm explants by the BMP blocker Noggin (Launay et al. 1996). Likewise, the potent neuralizing effect of Chordin can be blocked by a dominant-negative FGF receptor or a morpholino oligonucleotide targeting the IGF receptor (Pera et al. 2003). Thus, the neuralizing effect of BMP inhibitors is somehow tied to FGF and IFG signaling. The question is, how? Because FGF8 and IFG2 activate MAPK, Pera et al. (2003) took heed from previous work showing that MAPK inhibits the BMP signal-transduction factor Smad1 (Kretzschmar et al. 1997a). Smad1 is directly phosphorylated by the BMP receptor, resulting in Smad1 activation (Kretzschmar et al. 1997b), and by MAPK in response to EGF, resulting in Smad1 inhibition (Kretzschmar et al. 1997a; Fig. 2). Smad transcription factors mediate gene responses to the entire TGF (Transforming Growth Factor) family, to which the BMPs belong (for review, see Massague 2000; Derynck and Zhang 2003). Smads 1, 5, and 8 act primarily downstream of BMP receptors and Smads 2 and 3 downstream of TGF , Activin and Nodal receptors. Smad proteins have two conserved globular domains—the MH1 and MH2 domains (Fig. 2). The MH1 domain is involved in DNA binding and the MH2 domain in binding to cytoplasmic retention factors, activated receptors, nucleoporins in the nuclear pore, and DNA-binding cofactors, coactivators, and corepressors in the nucleus (for review, see Shi and Massague 2003). Receptor-mediated phosphorylation occurs at the carboxy-terminal sequence SXS. This enables the nuclear accumulation of Smads and their association with the shared partner Smad4 to form transcriptional complexes that are interpreted by the cell as a function of the context (Massague 2000). Between the MH1 and MH2 domains lies a linker region of variable sequence and length. Attention was drawn to this region when it was found that EGF (epidermal growth factor), a classical activator of the Ras/ MAPK pathway, causes phosphorylation of the Smad1 linker at four MAPK sites (PXSP sequences; Kretzschmar et al. 1997a). This prevents the nuclear localization of Smad1 and inhibits BMP signaling. Mutation of these E-MAIL j-massague@ski.mskcc.org; FAX (212) 717-3298. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ gad.1167003.

Introduction and objectivesThe majority of inherited cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are caused by mutations that affect the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) receptor 2. Recently, patients with pulmonary veno-occlusive...

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by congenital malformation of the great toes and by progressive heterotopic bone formation in muscle tissue. Recently, a mutation involving a single amino acid substitution in a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor, ALK2, was identified in patients with FOP. We report here that the identical mutation, R206H, was observed in 19 Japanese patients with sporadic FOP. This mutant receptor, ALK2(R206H), activates BMP signaling without ligand binding. Moreover, expression of Smad1 and Smad5 was up-regulated in response to muscular injury. ALK2(R206H) with Smad1 or Smad5 induced osteoblastic differentiation that could be inhibited by Smad7 or dorsomorphin. Taken together, these findings suggest that the heterotopic bone formation in FOP may be induced by a constitutively activated BMP receptor signaling through Smad1 or Smad5. Gene transfer of Smad7 or inhibition of type I receptors with dorsomorphin may represent strategies for blocking the activity induced by ALK2(R206H) in FOP.

Dullard Promotes Degradation and Dephosphorylation of BMP Receptors and Is Required for Neural Induction

Glypican LON-2 Is a Conserved Negative Regulator of BMP-like Signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans

O-GlcNAcylation Dampens Dpp/BMP Signaling to Ensure Proper Drosophila Embryonic Development.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multi-functional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) superfamily. The roles of BMPs in embryonic development and cellular functions in postnatal and adult animals have been extensively studied in recent years. Signal transduction studies have revealed that Smad1, 5 and 8 are the immediate downstream molecules of BMP receptors and play a central role in BMP signal transduction. Studies from transgenic and knockout mice and from animals and humans with naturally occurring mutations in BMPs and related genes have shown that BMP signaling plays critical roles in heart, neural and cartilage development. BMPs also play an important role in postnatal bone formation. BMP activities are regulated at different molecular levels. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that BMP-2 can be utilized in various therapeutic interventions such as bone defects, non-union fractures, spinal fusion, osteoporosis and root canal surgery. Tissue-specific knockout of a specific BMP ligand, a subtype of BMP receptors or a specific signaling molecule is required to further determine the specific role of a BMP ligand, receptor or signaling molecule in a particular tissue. BMPs are members of the TGFbeta superfamily. The activity of BMPs was first identified in the 1960s (Urist, M.R. (1965) "Bone formation by autoinduction", Science 150, 893-899), but the proteins responsible for bone induction remained unknown until the purification and sequence of bovine BMP-3 (osteogenin) and cloning of human BMP-2 and 4 in the late 1980s (Wozney, J.M. et al. (1988) "Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities", Science 242, 1528-1534; Luyten, F.P. et al. (1989) "Purification and partial amino acid sequence of osteogenin, a protein initiating bone differentiation", J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13377-13380; Wozney, J.M. (1992) "The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis", Mol. Reprod. Dev. 32, 160-167). To date, around 20 BMP family members have been identified and characterized. BMPs signal through serine/threonine kinase receptors, composed of type I and II subtypes. Three type I receptors have been shown to bind BMP ligands, type IA and IB BMP receptors (BMPR-IA or ALK-3 and BMPR-IB or ALK-6) and type IA activin receptor (ActR-IA or ALK-2) (Koenig, B.B. et al. (1994) "Characterization and cloning of a receptor for BMP-2 and BMP-4 from NIH 3T3 cells", Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5961-5974; ten Dijke, P. et al. (1994) "Identification of type I receptors for osteogenic protein-1 and bone morphogenetic protein-4", J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16985-16988; Macias-Silva, M. et al. (1998) "Specific activation of Smad1 signaling pathways by the BMP7 type I receptor, ALK2", J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25628-25636). Three type II receptors for BMPs have also been identified and they are type II BMP receptor (BMPR-II) and type II and IIB activin receptors (ActR-II and ActR-IIB) (Yamashita, H. et al. (1995) "Osteogenic protein-1 binds to activin type II receptors and induces certain activin-like effects", J. Cell. Biol. 130, 217-226; Rosenzweig, B.L. et al. (1995) "Cloning and characterization of a human type II receptor for bone morphogenetic proteins", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7632-7636; Kawabata, M. et al. (1995) "Cloning of a novel type II serine/threonine kinase receptor through interaction with the type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor", J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5625-5630). Whereas BMPR-IA, IB and II are specific to BMPs, ActR-IA, II and IIB are also signaling receptors for activins. These receptors are expressed differentially in various tissues. Type I and II BMP receptors are both indispensable for signal transduction. After ligand binding they form a heterotetrameric-activated receptor complex consisting of two pairs of a type I and II receptor complex (Moustakas, A. and C.H. Heldi (2002) "From mono- to oligo-Smads: the heart of the matter in TGFbeta signal transduction" Genes Dev. 16, 67-871). The type I BMP receptor substrates include a protein family, the Smad proteins, that play a central role in relaying the BMP signal from the receptor to target genes in the nucleus. Smad1, 5 and 8 are phosphorylated by BMP receptors in a ligand-dependent manner (Hoodless, P.A. et al. (1996) "MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways", Cell 85, 489-500; Chen Y. et al. (1997) "Smad8 mediates the signaling of the receptor serine kinase", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12938-12943; Nishimura R. et al. (1998) "Smad5 and DPC4 are key molecules in mediating BMP-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation of the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12", J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1872-1879). After release from the receptor, the phosphorylated Smad proteins associate with the related protein Smad4, which acts as a shared partner. This complex translocates into the nucleus and participates in gene transcription with other transcription factors (). A significant advancement about the understanding of in vivo functions of BMP ligands, receptors and signaling molecules has been achieved in recent years.

xCyp26c Induced by Inhibition of BMP Signaling Is Involved in Anterior-Posterior Neural Patterning of Xenopus laevis

Endogenous and Ectopic Expression ofnogginSuggests a Conserved Mechanism for Regulation of BMP Function during Limb and Somite Patterning

Limb development membrane protein-1 (LMBR1)/lipocalin-interacting membrane receptor (LIMR)-type proteins are putative nine-transmembrane receptors that are evolutionarily conserved across metazoans. However, their biological function is unknown. Here, we show that the fly family member Lilipod (Lili) is required for germ-line stem cell (GSC) self-renewal in the Drosophila ovary where it enhances bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. lili mutant GSCs are lost through differentiation, and display reduced levels of the Dpp transducer pMad and precocious activation of the master differentiation factor bam. Conversely, overexpressed Lili induces supernumerary pMad-positive bamP-GFP-negative GSCs. Interestingly, differentiation of lili mutant GSCs is bam-dependent; however, its effect on pMad is not. Thus, although it promotes stem cell self-renewal by repressing a bam-dependent process, Lilipod enhances transduction of the Dpp signal independently of its suppression of differentiation. In addition, because Lili is still required by a ligand-independent BMP receptor, its function likely occurs between receptor activation and pMad phosphorylation within the signaling cascade. This first, to our knowledge, in vivo characterization of a LMBR1/LIMR-type protein in a genetic model reveals an important role in modulating BMP signaling during the asymmetric division of an adult stem cell population and in other BMP signaling contexts.

Opposing Effects of Wnt and MAPK on BMP/Smad Signal Duration