Abstract
At various times the small group in the work place has been seen as either the organization's means of controlling workers or a response to increasing power and demands. This article analyzes shifts in social science research and theory on these groups, illustrating this ambivalence by discussing the attitudes of Le Bon, Taylor, Allport, Mayo, Sherif, Lewin, and others. The authors then present a historical survey of the image and reality of work groups during 1935-1981, which they found depended on the relative power of labor and capital as indicated by strikes and employment rates in specific periods. At times when worker power peaked, democratic, group-oriented methods were advocated, when worker power declined, individualistic, authoritative approaches prevailed The authors conclude that as more psychologists become unionized the needs of workers rather than management-particularly alienating work conditions and harmful consequences of lack of worker control-could be an increasing focus of their attention.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
