Abstract

The essay examines the model case, the stateless Jewish diaspora, and asks why a dispersed powerful people like “the” Romans is not analyzed as diaspora. Do people, who establish institutions of rule far from their core and mythical place of origin, Rome in Italy in this case, and who impose their power, not form diasporas? Other ethnic, professional, and religious groups established diasporic connectivity: the Normans, men and women of Christian faith, Indian Ocean merchants as well as, from mid-15th century the Southeast Asian “Chinese” It is argued that specific socio-economic rather than ethno-cultural groups from specific locations form translocal rather than transnational communities and engage in cultural transformations along the routes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.