The visual outcomes and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification: long term results.

Abstract

Objective: To compare visual outcomes and complications between manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the tertiary care center. A total of 1281 cases underwent manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification from January 2014 to December 2016. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) along with the rates of complications were compared between both groups.Results: Five hundred and twenty-one patients (40.67%) and 760 patients (59.33%) were subjected by staff members and residents, respectively. Altogether, 689 cases (53.79%) were subjected to MSICS technique and 592 cases (46.21%) to phacoemulsification. The MSICS group had significantly harder cataract (cataract grading ≥ 4+ :31.64% vs. 7.77%; p<0.001). One month postoperatively, good visual outcome (BCVA ≥ 6 /18) in the phacoemulsification group was higher than that in the MSICS group (86.33% vs. 72.12%, p<0.001). The risk factor for poor outcome (post-operative BCVA < 6 /60 in both groups) was the presence of associated ocular pathologies. The intraoperative and perioperative complications rates were higher in the MSICS group (16.55% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001). The most common complications were hyphema (4.35%), posterior capsule ruptures (4.21%), and prolapsed iris (3.05%). Long-term postoperative complication rates were higher in the phacoemulsification group (9.29% vs. 21.28%, p<0.001). The most common complication was posterior capsule opacity (8.71% vs. 20.44%, p<0.001). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) was similar in both groups (0.29% vs. 0.17%, p=1.00).Conclusion: The number of patients who had experienced good visual outcomes was higher in the phacoemulsification group. However, for both groups, no significant differences were found on the long-term complication rate.