Abstract

BackgroundThe diagnostic accuracies of the imaging studies should be clearly acknowledged in managing head and neck cancer patients; however, the accuracies of preoperative imaging studies in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis are still not clarified. This study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in detecting RPLN metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.MethodsFor 123 patients who had performed RPLN dissection during the surgery of their squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, preoperative CT, MRI, and/or PET-CT were reviewed for RPLN metastasis in a blinded fashion by one experienced radiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of each imaging modality were assessed, by comparing with the histopathologic findings of the resected RPLNs that served as the standard of reference.ResultsRPLNs were pathologically positive for metastasis in 43 of the 123 patients (35%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy in detecting metastasis to RPLN were 65, 94, 85, 83, and 84% for CT; 74, 94, 87, 87 and 87% for MRI; 83, 93, 89, 89 and 89% for PET-CT, respectively. When all the three imaging modalities were considered together (n = 74), they offered sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 87%, negative predictive value of 93%, and accuracy of 91%.ConclusionsThe preoperative imaging studies offered relatively high specificity rates, but rather low sensitivity rates. The three imaging modalities altogether increased diagnostic accuracies, which highlights the potential of the three studies when used altogether can minimize missed diagnoses of RPLN metastasis.

Highlights

  • The diagnostic accuracies of the imaging studies should be clearly acknowledged in managing head and neck cancer patients; the accuracies of preoperative imaging studies in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis are still not clarified

  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PETCT in determining RPLN metastasis by comparing their results with pathology results in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck who underwent RPLN dissection

  • Preoperative imaging studies (CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)) were reviewed in a blinded fashion by one experienced radiologist (DYY who have been specializing in head and neck imaging for 12 years), who determined whether the results were positive or negative for cancer metastasis to the RPLNs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnostic accuracies of the imaging studies should be clearly acknowledged in managing head and neck cancer patients; the accuracies of preoperative imaging studies in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis are still not clarified. This study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in detecting RPLN metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Tumor metastasis to the retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) is as a strong predictor of poor prognosis in head and neck cancer patients [1,2,3,4]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of CT, MRI, and PETCT in determining RPLN metastasis by comparing their results with pathology results in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck who underwent RPLN dissection

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.