Abstract

To examine patients' knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding electronic mail communication with their family physicians. Mail survey. A university-based family practice center. Adult patients (18 years and older) of full-time faculty physicians at a university-based family practice center who had seen their physicians at lease once in the 10-month period between July 1, 1992, and April 30, 1993 (N = 4094). Subjects were eligible for participation if both they and their physicians had an electronic mail address at the University of Kentucky, Lexington (n = 117). None. Patient-reported knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding the utility of electronic mail as a means of patient-physician communication. The response rate to the survey was 74% (n = 87). Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was positively perceived by patients for whom electronic mail was accessible Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was perceived to increase speed, convenience, and access to medical care. Electronic mail communication was perceived to be good for simple and nonurgent problems, such as refilling prescriptions, communicating laboratory results, and making appointments. Ninety percent of the patients who had corresponded with their physicians via electronic mail used the medium to discuss a medical problem. Although electronic mail is not presently in wide use for patient-physician communication, there is great potential for its widespread acceptance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.