Abstract
The following energy sources, in a various combinations were assessed to provide potable water using seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) for around 50,000 people in Eritrea: wind power and solar power. Various types of SWRO technology were employed and the cost of scenarios that were able to meet the users’ water needs was compared with the costs of the equivalent diesel generator powered scenario over 25 years. The most financially-attractive scenario, a hybridised power plant using solar and wind power was compared with the equivalent conventionally (diesel generator) powered scenario using present and net present value (NPV) methodology. The discount rate used for NPV calculations was found to be pivotal for this comparison, so the logic of the appropriate discount rate was investigated and a discount rate of 3.6% was considered the most appropriate. This resulted in the renewable powered solution for this scenario being financially attractive when compared to the diesel generator powered scenario. This conclusion was mainly due to recent changes in the prices of diesel fuel in Eritrea and solar power generally. Research conducted on this scenario previously, and published in 2014 based on 2010 prices, concluded that this scenario was not financially attractive in comparison to diesel power.
Highlights
Renewable energy is currently considered by many to only have viability for a small portion of energy delivery within a larger system due to intermittency
Where Pg 1 = the power available to operate the reverse osmosis (RO) plant at each hour during the year; index(i) identifies the location of the prevailing seawater temperature for each hour of the year; ppolycoeff is a file that contains all the polynomial equations relating to each 0.01°C step from 3 to 42 °C; i=1:rwr defines the number of times that the calculation should be conducted before stopping; i=the number of the calculation being conducted, in this case, conducted in sequence from 1 – the max number of which is 8760; Polyval is the matlab function that evaluates the polynomial equation identified by (index(i)) making the corresponding Pg at (i) the subject. 2.2
Renewable energy system employed within model The solar array for this process assumes that 10% of the available radiation, at any time when the sun is shining, is captured and converted to usable DC electrical power
Summary
Renewable energy is currently considered by many to only have viability for a small portion of energy delivery within a larger system due to intermittency. This is in comparison to the UK, where according to the Metrological Office [2], the minimum rainfall between 1981 and 2010 is around 600 mm.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Seawater Reverse Osmosis
Solar Power
Net Present Value
Use Of Renewable Energy
Wind Power
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
iScience
Feb 1, 2022
Energy Reports
Oct 1, 2023
Desalination and Water Treatment
Aug 26, 2014
Jan 1, 2018
Environmental Research Letters
Oct 4, 2018
Dec 23, 2010
Dec 19, 2019
Water Research
May 1, 2009
Energy Conversion and Management
Apr 1, 2020
Renewable Energy
Jul 1, 2014
Vidnovluvana energetika
Mar 30, 2021
Desalination and Water Treatment
Desalination and Water Treatment
Jan 1, 2021
Desalination and Water Treatment
Jan 1, 2021
Desalination and Water Treatment
Jan 1, 2021
Desalination and Water Treatment
Jan 1, 2020
Desalination and Water Treatment
Dec 1, 2019
Desalination and Water Treatment
Oct 29, 2018
Desalination and Water Treatment
Sep 19, 2018
Desalination and Water Treatment
Sep 19, 2018
Desalination and Water Treatment
Jan 1, 2017