Abstract

The writing of academic texts in which the voice of the author figures more prominently is actively gaining support among academics. There is an increasing shift towards a more personal style of academic writing where authors, through the use of personal pronouns, are explicitly present in their texts. However, it seems as if many first-year students not only use the first-person pronoun excessively, but also find it difficult to apply the practice appropriately in their argumentative texts. This article focuses on the use of the first-person pronouns ek [I], my [me] and myns insiens [in my opinion] in the writing of Afrikaans-speaking students. A corpus-based investigation was conducted into the frequency and distribution of use throughout the three parts of an argument (introduction, content and conclusion), as well as the functional and objective application of these pronouns in an authentic learner corpus. The analysis gave insight into the use of first-person pronouns as well as potential problems pertaining thereto. In light of the findings in the particular corpus, it is recommended that Afrikaans-speaking first-year students’ skills in the use of first-person pronouns, should be further developed at university. Keywords: academic argument; academic writing; coherence; conventions; first-person pronouns; metadiscourse

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.