Abstract
The article explores the problems of using digital technologies in the administration of criminal justice. The conclusion is justified that in evidence artificial intelligence can be used to a very limited extent - only to control the admissibility of evidence. Consideration is being given to the possibility of using digital software systems to qualify the act committed by the accused. The erroneous approach is justified, according to which artificial intelligence can take part in the sentencing of the defendant. As the main direction for the use of information technologies in criminal proceedings, the solution of the tasks of optimizing hardware and technical, organizational, documentary and other routine processes, as well as work to eliminate errors of a legal and technical nature, is determined
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
