Abstract

According to James, Hawthorne chose this interest as the playground of his imagination, as one of his toys! The second error stems from more recent emphasis on Hawthorne's concern with the social consequences of sin, confusing sin merely grave with sin unpardonable. Thus some writers, in correcting the assumption that Hawthorne's relation to sin was not moral, have unduly minimized its necessary theological basis. The traditional Christianity of Hawthorne has been reaffirmed in timely studies which refocus emphasis on the theological content of his works. Although Henry G. Fairbanks is not concerned specifically with the unpardonable sin, his article does imply that it, of all sins, has no meaning unless considered against traditional backgrounds. Leonard J. Fick makes

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.