Abstract
Good subsemigroups of {mathbb {N}}^d have been introduced as the most natural generalization of numerical ones. Although their definition arises by taking into account the properties of value semigroups of analytically unramified rings (for instance the local rings of an algebraic curve), not all good semigroups can be obtained as value semigroups, implying that they can be studied as pure combinatorial objects. In this work, we are going to introduce the definition of length and genus for good semigroups in {mathbb {N}}^d. For d=2, we show how to count all the local good semigroups with a fixed genus through the introduction of the tree of local good subsemigroups of {mathbb {N}}^2, generalizing the analogous concept introduced in the numerical case. Furthermore, we study the relationships between these elements and others previously defined in the case of good semigroups with two branches, as the type and the embedding dimension. Finally, we show that an analogue of Wilf’s conjecture fails for good semigroups in {mathbb {N}}^2.
Highlights
The study of good semigroups was formerly motivated by the fact that they are the value semigroups of one-dimensional analytically unramified rings
We report the results regarding the computation of the number of local good semigroups with a fixed genus up to genus 27, produced with an algorithm written in "GAP" [17] using the package "NumericalSgps" [12]
To conclude the paper we observe that the definitions and the algorithm given in the previous section give us the possibility to introduce an analogue of the Wilf conjecture for good semigroups
Summary
The study of good semigroups was formerly motivated by the fact that they are the value semigroups of one-dimensional analytically unramified rings We definitely prove that length, genus and type satisfy the relationships t(S) + l(S) − 1 ≤ g(S) ≤ t(S)l(S) in the case of good semigroups (Proposition 3.6 and Corollary 3.7). To conclude the paper we observe that the definitions and the algorithm given in the previous section give us the possibility to introduce an analogue of the Wilf conjecture for good semigroups. In this case, we found counterexamples for the conjecture (Example 3.8) but the problem remains open for good semigroups which are value semigroups of a ring
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.