Abstract

We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possessed duplex retinas that were rod dominated. In R. pumilio, the density of both cones and rods were high (cone to rod ratio: 1:1.23) and reflected the species’ fundamentally diurnal, but largely crepuscular lifestyle. Similarly, the ratio of cones to rods in M. namaquensis (1:12.4) reflected its nocturnal lifestyle. Similar rod density peaks were observed (R. pumilio: ~84467/mm2; M. namaquensis: ~81088/mm2), but a density gradient yielded higher values in the central (~56618/mm2) rather than in the peripheral retinal region (~32689/mm2) in R. pumilio. Two separate cone types (S-cones and M/L-cones) were identified implying dichromatic color vision in the study species. In M. namaquensis, both cone populations showed a centro-peripheral density gradient and a consistent S- to M/L-cone ratio (~1:7.8). In R. pumilio, S cones showed a centro-peripheral gradient (S- to M/L-cone ratio; central: 1:7.8; peripheral: 1:6.8) which appeared to form a visual streak, and a specialized area of M/L-cones (S- to M/L-cone ratio: 1:15) was observed inferior to the optic nerve. The number of photoreceptors per linear degree of visual angle, estimated from peak photoreceptor densities and eye size, were four cones and 15 rods per degree in M. namaquensis and 11 cones and 12 rods per degree in R. pumilio. Thus, in nocturnal M. namaquensis rods provide much finer image sampling than cones, whereas in diurnal/crepuscular R. pumilio both photoreceptor types provide fine image sampling. IpRGCs were comparably sparse in R. pumilio (total = 1012) and M. namaquensis (total = 862), but were homogeneously distributed in M. namaquensis and densest in the dorso-nasal quadrant in R. pumilio. The adaptive significance of the latter needs further investigation.

Highlights

  • The vertebrate eye and in particular the retina, acts as a mediator between the light environment and the brain of an animal, converting external light stimuli into biological signals

  • We present and compare the size of the eyes, the density and topographical distributions of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in two murid rodents that inhabit different photoenvironments; the diurnally active Rhabdomys pumilio and the nocturnally active Micaelamys namaquensis

  • The presence and spatial distribution of rods, cones and ipRGCs in R. pumilio and M. namaquensis retinae are described in the present study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The vertebrate eye and in particular the retina, acts as a mediator between the light environment and the brain of an animal, converting external light stimuli into biological signals (neural impulses). The recognition of the ipRGCs as distinct photoreceptors was first suggested by studies showing normal photoentrainment of the circadian system in mice that lacked all functional rods and cones (rd/rd cl mice) [1,6,7]. As a result, it has been concluded in the past that conventional photoreceptors do not contribute to non-image forming vision. Studies have since shown that ipRGCs receive input from rods and cones for non-imageforming processes, but that they are involved in image-forming vision [8,9,10,11]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.