The Tip Leakage Flow of an Unshrouded High Pressure Turbine Blade With Tip Cooling

Abstract

Experimental, analytical and numerical methods have been employed to study the aerodynamic performance of four different cooled tips with coolant mass ratios between zero and 1.2% at three tip gaps of 1%, 1.6% and 2.2% of the chord. The four cooled tips are two flat tips with different coolant holes, a cooled suction side squealer tip and a cooled cavity tip. Each tip has ten coolant holes with the same diameter. The uncooled cavity tip produces the smallest loss among all uncooled tips. On the cooled flat tip, the coolant is injected normally into the tip gap and mixes directly with flow inside the tip gap. The momentum exchange between the coolant and the flow that enters the tip gap creates significant blockage. As the coolant mass flow ratio increases, the tip leakage loss of the cooled flat tip first decreases and then increases. For the cooled cavity tip, the blockage effect of the coolant is not as big as that on the cooled flat tip. This is because after the coolant exits the coolant holes, it mixes with flow in the cavity first, and then mixes with tip flow in the tip gap. The tip leakage loss of the cooled cavity tip increases as the coolant mass flow ratio increase. As a result, at a tip gap of 1.6% of the chord, the cooled cavity tip gives the lowest loss. At the smallest tip gap of 1% of the chord, the cooled flat tip produces less loss than the cooled cavity tip when the coolant mass flow ratios larger than 0.23%. This is because with the same coolant mass flow ratio, a proportionally larger blockage is created at the smallest tip gap. At the largest tip gap of 2.2% of the chord, the cavity tip achieves the best aerodynamic performance. This is because, the effect of the coolant is reduced and the benefits of the cavity tip geometry dominate. At a coolant mass flow ratio of 0.55%, the cooled flat tips produce a lower loss than the cavity tip at tip gaps less than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled cavity tip produces the least loss for tip gaps larger than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled suction side squealer has the worst aerodynamic performance for all tip gaps studied.