Abstract

The catastrophic nuclear incident in Fukushima in March 2011 has shocked Europe. Its impact was particularly strong in Germany with its decade-old anti-nuclear movements. Political and technological re-orientations were initiated in that country without considering at any depth the potential of European law and politics to control or obstruct such moves. Somewhat paradoxically, the Euratom Treaty of 1957 and also the new Treaty of Lisbon confirm the right of each Member State to decide upon the use of nuclear energy autonomously. This means that European citizens remain exposed to the risks of that technology until the highly unlikely consent of all Member States to abstain from its further use. That constellation poses a dilemma for democracy because it implies that each political decision taken within parts of the Union exerts external pan-European effects. The article considers the chances for an inclusive democratic process which would lead to a legitimated European decision. It examines the possibilities offered by the new European Citizens Initiative which the Lisbon Treaty has institutionalized in its Article 12 and concludes that this instrument could indeed be used to instigate a European-wide debate which may eventually lead to pertinent changes in the Treaties.

Highlights

  • The following section of this paper, which will discuss the so-called democracy problem of the European project, might look like an overly abstract detour

  • The Euratom Treaty of 1957 and the new Treaty of Lisbon confirm the right of each Member State to decide upon the use of nuclear energy autonomously

  • The article considers the chances for an inclusive democratic process which would lead to a legitimated European decision

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The following section of this paper, which will discuss the so-called democracy problem of the European project, might look like an overly abstract detour. It is submitted, that such considerations are an indispensable preparatory step towards an adequate understanding of the problems of legitimate European decision making in general as well as an evaluation of the potential of the recently institutionalized European Citizens Initiative (ECI) (Section 2) and for a proper interpretation of the pertinent provision in the Treaty of Lisbon and of Regulation 211/2011 (Section 4). These comments are not striving for any comprehensiveness They will instead focus on the present contested example of atomic energy (Section 3)

The Compensation of Nation State Failures as Europe’s Vocation
Democracy Deficits of Nation States
Potential of the New ECI
Flaws of the European Treaties
Europe’s Political Deficit and the ECI
The ECI in Democratic Perspectives
Primary Law and the Euratom Treaty
Acknowledging Tensions
The Primacy of Politics and the Search for Mediating Initiatives

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.