The Test-Retest Reliability of a Clinically-Relevant Dual-Task Assessment in Healthy College Students

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The dual-task (DT) paradigm consists of concurrent administration of motor and cognitive tasks which may demonstrate improved measurement properties of the included tasks as compared to independent administration. Our study examined the test-retest reliability of a clinically-relevant DT assessment. Methods Our prospective cohort study included 60 (53.3% female) healthy, recreationally active college students (Age=20.5–1.34 years; Height=171.7–9.33 cm). Participants completed the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) and timed tandem gait (TTG) test concurrently for the DT assessment at two time points separated by a two-week test-retest interval. The SAC composite score (45 points) was calculated by summing the domain scores of immediate memory (30 points) which consisted of a 10-word list, concentration (5 points), and delayed recall (10 points). The TTG composite score was calculated by summing the mean time to complete the TTG during each SAC task (3 trials for immediate memory, up to 5 trials for the digits-backwards task, and one trial for the months in reverse order and delayed recall tasks). Mixed-model intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC[3,1]) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate test-retest reliability between time points for the SAC and TTG composite scores. Results Mean SAC (39.4–3.80 vs. 39.6–3.49 points) and TTG (52.1–9.44 vs. 48.2–8.33 sec) composite scores were observed at time points 1 and 2, respectively. Moderate (ICC[3,1]=0.56 [0.26, 0.74]) and good (ICC[3,1]=0.88 [0.80, 0.93]) test-retest reliability were observed for the SAC and TTG composite scores, respectively. Conclusion Test-retest reliability for our DT assessment aligns with previously established values for independent administration of the SAC and TTG.