The Terminal Velocity of Axisymmetric Cloud Drops and Raindrops Evaluated by the Immersed Boundary Method

Abstract

AbstractThe terminal velocity of cloud drops and raindrops used in numerical model calculations can significantly affect weather predictions. Current formulations rely on laboratory experiments made in the 1940s and 1960s. Because these experiments were performed only at typical environmental conditions of 20°C and 1013 hPa, parameterizations have been introduced to deduce the terminal velocity aloft without rigorous evaluation. In this study, an incompressible two-phase flow direct numerical simulation model is used to calculate the free-falling motion of axisymmetric drops with diameters between 0.025 and 0.5 mm to study the terminal fall velocity. Simulated terminal fall velocities of free-falling drops at 20°C and 1013 hPa agree within 3.2% with the previous empirical parameterization (Beard formula), and 4.5% with existing laboratory data in the diameter range between 0.3 and 0.5 mm. The velocities converge to the analytic Hadamard–Rybczynski solution within 2% for small Reynolds numbers, demonstrating the robustness of our simulations. Simulations under various atmospheric conditions show that existing empirical parameterizations that account for the air density dependence of the terminal velocity have errors up to 11.8% under the conditions examined in this study. We propose a new empirical formula that describes the air density dependence of the terminal velocity. It is also shown that the falling speed of a small drop is not sensitive to shape oscillation, and the terminal velocity decreases by only less than 1.3% when the axis ratio increases by 12% with reduced surface tension. Internal circulation within falling drops is also presented and compared with previous studies.