Abstract

The author welcomes the inclusion of the precautionary approach among the binding provisions of the recently concluded Straddling Stocks Agreement, but argues that to conceive of the precautionary principle solely as an actual or potential rule of law is to miss its most valuable contribution to the development of law and policy. The principle is of particular relevance in framing arguments about the interpretation of the relevant legal instruments and in enhancing the acceptability of arguments in favor of conservation measures. The author seeks to demonstrate the manner in which precaution as a principle or general concept may influence the interpretation of the Straddling Stocks Agreement and other legal texts and contribute to an ecosystem orientation within international fisheries law.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.