Abstract

Simple SummaryPolo is an equestrian sport that requires two teams of four players to score goals at opposing ends of a 150 m × 275 m pitch. Each player is rated on a handicap system (−2 to +10) that quantifies their abilities and permits their inclusion in different levels of Polo play; the cumulative handicap of the four players sets the level of play. Using GPS technology, we investigated how levels of Polo differ regarding distance covered, speeds achieved and high-intensity activities performed. As cumulative Polo handicap increased, so too did the distances and average speeds attained, decelerations performed and impacts encountered during each period of play. These findings suggest that as each player improves and increases their handicap, they will need to ensure the ponies they play have sufficient aerobic, anaerobic and speed capacities to perform effectively at that level. This information provides valuable insights to Polo players, grooms and equine vets, as to how they can best prepare their ponies for game-day and how they may be able to maintain pony longevity in the sport.Global positioning systems (GPS) have recently been shown to reliably quantify the spatiotemporal characteristics of Polo, with the physiological demands of Polo play at low- and high-goal levels also investigated. This study aims to describe the spatiotemporal demands of Polo across 0–24 goal levels. A player-worn GPS unit was used to quantify distance, speed and high-intensity activities performed. Data were divided into chukkas and five equine-based speed zones, grouped per cumulative player handicap and assessed using standardized mean differences. Average distance and speed per chukka increased in accordance with cumulative player handicap, with the magnitude of differences being trivial–large and trivial–very large, respectively. Differences between time spent in high-intensity speed zones (zones 4 and 5) show a linear increase in magnitude, when comparing 0 goal Polo to all other levels of play (Small–Very Large; 6–24 goals, respectively). High-intensity activities predominantly shared this trend, displaying trivial–large differences between levels. These findings highlight increased cardiovascular, anaerobic and speed based physiological demands on Polo ponies as playing level increases. Strategies such as high-intensity interval training, maximal speed work and aerobic conditioning may be warranted to facilitate this development and improve pony welfare and performance.

Highlights

  • The use of global positioning systems (GPS) in sport and animal research is increasingly prevalent and can provide valuable data pertaining to activity type, distance covered, speeds attained and location [1,2,3,4]

  • This is most apparent in speed zones 4 and 5, as 24 goal Polo displays a very large increase in distance covered in speed zones 4 and 5 compared to 0 goal play

  • The aim of this research was to assess the spatiotemporal demands of Polo and to accurately describe and compare the performance requirements placed upon Polo ponies across varying levels of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of global positioning systems (GPS) in sport and animal research is increasingly prevalent and can provide valuable data pertaining to activity type, distance covered, speeds attained and location [1,2,3,4]. Despite reported widespread use in equine settings [4,5,6], the use of GPS to provide tactical or training value in equestrian sport appears limited or underreported. This may be due to a perceived inability to interpret the data obtained [5,6,7], most published GPS use in equestrian settings consists of methodological reports, typically pertaining to reliability [7,8,9,10,11]. A greater understanding of the external workloads (speed, distance, accelerations, and decelerations) placed upon Polo ponies would inform training and competition management but would be of benefit to ponies returning from injury [12] or transitioning from one equestrian discipline to another, as individualization of training volume and intensity can be assessed and prescribed.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.