Abstract
Many gregarious species require complex patterns of communication for maintaining coordinated behaviors, articulated social structure and group cohesion. In mammal species, social complexity has been considered the driving force for the development of advanced acoustic communication systems. Striped dolphins are highly social, showing large group size with females maintaining strong bonds with kin. Here, we tested the hypothesis that more complex acoustic pattern plays a key role in social activity in the striped dolphins. The production rate of clicks, whistles and burst pulses, and the acoustic features of whistles have been related to the activity context (feeding, travelling, resting and socializing). Furthermore, complex calls, consisting of a combination of frequency-modulated, and/or pulsed components were detected. Higher whistles and burst pulses production rates were recorded during socializing. Also, the social activity can be discriminated basing on the modulation of the whistle contour. Biphonic calls were especially recorded during social interaction events, suggesting that these phenomena can encode information about individual or group identity to conspecifics. Outcomes indicate the pivotal role of vocal complexity during social context and elicit further investigations of the communication system of small odontocetes from local to wider spatial scale.
Highlights
Group living and the relationships between individuals imply the need to recognize each other and to strengthen bonds (Kappeler, 2019)
The “social complexity hypothesis for communicative complexity (SCHCC)” posits that variations in communication systems develop due to social structuring and that more complex social structures can lead to more complex communication systems (Freeberg et al, 2012a; Bouchet et al, 2013)
A group was defined as dolphins within approximately 100 m radius of each other (Irvine et al, 1981) that were observed in apparent association, moving in the same direction and often, but not always, engaged in the same activity (Shane, 1990)
Summary
Group living and the relationships between individuals imply the need to recognize each other and to strengthen bonds (Kappeler, 2019). Many gregarious species require complex patterns of communication for maintaining coordinated behaviors, articulated social structure, and group cohesion (Brudzynski, 2014). Social complexity has been considered the driving force for the development of advanced acoustic communication systems (Blumstein and Armitage, 1997; Freeberg et al, 2012a; Van Cise et al, 2018; Gustison et al, 2019). The “social complexity hypothesis for communicative complexity (SCHCC)” posits that variations in communication systems develop due to social structuring and that more complex social structures can lead to more complex communication systems (Freeberg et al, 2012a; Bouchet et al, 2013).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
