Abstract
Both Mildred Campbell's Social Origins of Some Early Americans' and my own recent reconsideration' deal with a single central problem: the interpretation of the evidence in two sets of seventeenth-century servant registrations for the social origins of those registered. Both papers acknowledge that the records pose some problems, yet both of us have made inferences and drawn conclusions from the evidence. All of our inferences are based on interpretive assumptions. The main purpose of this note is to make the assumptions entailed by each interpretation explicit, and to offer some evidence that bears on the relative plausibility of the different assumptions involved. The most difficult problem posed by the data results from the absence of any recorded occupations for large numbers of men in both sets of registrations. Several answers to the question why the occupations were not recorded have been suggested, but to date none has been universally accepted. Postponing the resolution of this question for the moment, it is possible to consider the different conclusions the data yield concerning the social and occupational groups from which the men without recorded occupations came. Two extreme assumptions can be used to establish the ranges within which any other allocation of these men will fall. One is that all the men without
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.