Abstract

Regulatory agencies charged with public health and safety typically promulgate uniform regulatory standards, which suggests the agencies are concerned mainly to reduce harmful externalities, with little concern for firms' costs. A focus on benefits, to the exclusion of costs, in standard-setting and enforcement leads to inefficiencies. We show that, even when the legislature cannot peg the budget to a specific enforcement policy, it can reduce the distortions by limiting the enforcement agency's budget and by permitting the agency to partially self-finance from rebates of noncompliance fines.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.