Abstract
AbstractThe academic debate on flood risk governance is paying increased attention to the shifting position of homeowners. Homeowners are increasingly expected to adapt their homes to protect against possible floods. Although an overall agreement seems to exist on the involvement of homeowners in flood risk governance, the academic literature is dispersed in its argumentation on why homeowners should be involved. Therefore, this article provides a coherent overview of the transition from flood protection to flood risk management, and subsequently of the arguments that unfold regarding the shifting position of homeowners within this debate. This overview, based on a systematic review of the academic literature, helps to shed light on the changing role of homeowners in flood risk governance and contributes to categorizing the arguments used in current academic reasoning on homeowner involvement in flood risk governance. We use a conceptual distinction between macro‐level and micro‐level arguments, and between individual and collective efforts to structure our results. This conceptual overview illustrates the potential gap in convincing homeowners of the urgency to take action, because the connection between the macro‐level arguments (i.e., climate change and responsibility) and the micro‐level arguments (i.e., minimizing flood damage on privately owned properties) is generally not made. We, therefore, suggest that a stronger coherence in the argumentation would contribute to increase homeowner awareness of their changing responsibilities, which might bring about a future shift toward a new phase in flood risk governance, in which the responsibilities of homeowners are more explicitly acknowledged and integrated into climate adaptation strategies.This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Water Human Water > Water Governance
Highlights
The debates of the last three decades on how to deal with flood risk have increasingly allotted more responsibility to homeowners in striving for flood resilience (Holub & Fuchs, 2009; Mees et al, 2012; Osberghaus, 2015)
In accordance to “Coleman's boat”, at the macro level, climate change and its consequences for the division of responsibilities in flood risk management can be further strengthened and substantiated, by connecting these arguments to the micro level arguments of minimizing flood damage by adaptations on privately owned properties (Figure 1)
This article has shown how homeowner involvement is currently substantiated in academic literature and what the opportunities are to improve this involvement in flood risk governance, through stressing their potential individual, micro-level contribution in this
Summary
The debates of the last three decades on how to deal with flood risk have increasingly allotted more responsibility to homeowners in striving for flood resilience (Holub & Fuchs, 2009; Mees et al, 2012; Osberghaus, 2015) In these debates, it is generally stated that homeowners can, and increasingly must, prepare their homes against possible flooding. Aside from the academic debate, this shift is recognized in policy as homeowners are increasingly expected to take personal measures to protect and prepare their homes against flooding (Begg et al, 2017) This contribution adopts a Eurocentric perspective on flood risk governance and task divisions between government, market stakeholders, and civil society. Non-European countries, on the other hand, have varying traditions in flood protection and homeowner involvement, they are excluded from this analysis
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
