Abstract
Abstract In the 2000s, several European states sought to increase foreign investment in their renewable energy sectors. Those governments later wound back those financial incentives. This resulted in dozens of investment disputes. One of the key issues in those disputes was whether the decision to amend or withdraw financial incentives breached investors' legitimate expectations under the fair and equitable treatment standard. This article argues that investors' legitimate expectations should operate analogously to the concept of estoppel. Therefore, if a state makes a clear commitment to induce investment (this includes commitments in legislation), and an investor reasonably relies on that commitment, then the state should not be able to renege on that commitment without generating liability for breaching the fair and equitable treatment standard.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
