Abstract
The article focuses on the relationship between two authoritative members of the Russian intelligentsia , P.B. Struve and N.S. Trubeckoj, and the Ukrainian question at the beginning of the 20th century. Two debates, one involving Struve and an anonymous Ukrainian in 1911-1912, and the other between Trubeckoj and the Ukrainian historian D. Dorosenko in 1927-1928, are presented and compared in order to highlight similarities in terms of content and cultural approach to the issue of Ukraine’s cultural and political independence from Russia. A shared cultural background, as well as the indisputable influence exerted by Struve on the Eurasian movement founded by Trubeckoj and other emigrant intellectuals, are considered the main causes of the convergent opinions examined in the article. In their writings Struve and Trubeckoj both express the need for a larger, pan-Russian cultural entity, in which the highest level is not achievable by Ukrainian culture by reason of its regional or local nature. Consequently, they roundly condemn the tendency towards separatism of the Ukrainian intelligentsia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
