The Role of Susceptibility in the Association Between Exposures and Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A Scoping Review.

Allergic skin diseases

Hand Hygiene Practices and Risk and Prevention of Hand Eczema during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Allergic contact dermatitis is an important cause of hand eczema. Patch testing is the only investigation available to prove the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Exposures to allergens differ according to geographical, occupational, economic and social factors. Accordingly, patterns of allergic contact dermatitis differ in different parts of the world and different regions of the same country. To study the causes of allergic contact dermatitis in adult patients with hand eczema with the help of patch testing. This was a cross-sectional study involving 54 hand eczema patients conducted between October 2013 and June 2015, at a tertiary care centre in Southern India. After a detailed history including history of occupational exposure and detailed examination, patch test was done on these patients with Indian standard series. The patches were removed after 48 hours. Another reading was taken after 72 hours. The readings were interpreted according to International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria and noted down. The data were summarized using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for categorical and dichotomous variables. The test of association was done with Fisher's-exact test. Hyperkeratotic hand eczema was the commonest morphological type (29%), followed by discoid eczema. Pompholyx was significantly more common among patients with history of atopy. A total of 20 patients (37%) showed patch test positivity to a total of 25 allergens. Nickel was the most common allergen (11.11%) followed by para-phenylenediamine (PPD) (7.4%). Nickel (6 patients) and cobalt (3 patients) were the common allergens among women, while potassium dichromate (3 patients) and parthenium (2 patients) were the common allergens among men. Potassium dichromate allergy was significantly more common among masons and PPD allergy was significantly more common among hair dye users. Discoid pattern of hand eczema was common among patients with allergy to potassium dichromate. Majority of the cases of hand eczema are not due to allergic contact dermatitis. History of atopy is common among patients with pompholyx. Allergic contact dermatitis due to nickel remains a common cause of hand eczema.

Given the high prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), hand eczema (HE), and smoking, and the impact that smoking has on skin disease, the authors reviewed the existing literature to assess the association between smoking and contact dermatitis or hand eczema. Using the PubMed and SCOPUS databases, a literature search identified articles related to allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and hand eczema and a possible association with smoking. The search period included articles prior to and including April 2016. Seven of eight articles described a positive relationship between smoking and allergic or irritant contact dermatitis, while nine of nineteen articles found a positive association between smoking and hand eczema. Published studies document that smoking may be an important risk factor for both allergic and irritant contact dermatitis as well as hand eczema.

Data regarding occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) and its effect on quality of life (QOL) in India are limited. To evaluate patients with OCD and record the outcome of treatment. All patients with OCD were evaluated for severity of disease (by the use of physician global assessment) and its effect on QOL (by use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index) questionnaire) at the first visit and after 3 months of treatment. Among 117 patients with OCD, hand eczema was present in 81.2%. Positive patch test reactions were found in 76%. The most common allergens were Parthenium hysterophorus and potassium dichromate. The most frequent diagnosis was occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) (57%), caused by farming and construction work, followed by occupational irritant contact dermatitis (OICD) (24%), caused by wet work. Severe psychosocial distress was recorded in 62.5% of patients. After 3 months of treatment, 83% improved significantly, and 54% had improvement in QOL. Farmers were most frequently affected, followed by construction workers and housewives. OACD was found at a higher frequency than OICD. The most frequent allergens were Parthenium hysterophorus in farmers, potassium dichromate in construction workers, and vegetables in housewives. OCD has a significant impact on QOL. Patch testing, in addition to standard treatment, improves the outcome considerably.

Atopic diseases are common in children and adolescents. However, epidemiological knowledge is sparse for hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis in this age group. Furthermore, no population-based studies have evaluated the prevalence of atopic diseases and hand and contact dermatitis in the same group of adolescents. To assess prevalence measures of atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, allergic rhinitis and hand and contact dermatitis in adolescents in Odense municipality, Denmark. The study was carried out as a cross-sectional study among 1501 eighth grade school children (age 12-16 years) and included questionnaire, interview, clinical examination and patch testing. The lifetime prevalence of AD was 21.3% (girls 25.7% vs. boys 17.0%, P < 0.001) using predefined questionnaire criteria. The 1-year period prevalence of AD was 6.7% and the point prevalence 3.6% (Hanifin and Rajka criteria). In the interview the lifetime prevalence of inhalant allergy was estimated as 17.7% (6.9% allergic asthma, 15.7% allergic rhinitis). The lifetime prevalence of hand eczema based on the questionnaire was 9.2%, the 1-year period prevalence was 7.3% and the point prevalence 3.2%, with a significant predominance in girls. A significant association was found both between AD and inhalant allergy, and between AD and hand eczema using lifetime prevalence measures. The point prevalence of contact allergy was 15.2% (girls 19.4% vs. boys 10.3%, P < 0.001), and present or past allergic contact dermatitis was found in 7.2% (girls 11.3% vs. boys 2.5%). Contact allergy was most common to nickel (8.6%) and fragrance mix (1.8%). High prevalence figures were found for atopic diseases, hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis, and the diseases were closely associated. A considerable number of adolescents still suffers from AD, and a considerable sex difference was noted for hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis. Nickel allergy and perfume allergy were the major contact allergies. In the future this cohort of eighth grade school children will be followed up with regard to the course and development of atopic diseases, hand eczema and contact dermatitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESContact allergy is associated with a significant morbidity all over the world. This study was performed to investigate the pattern of sensitization by contact allergens in the local population.DESIGN AND SETTINGRetrospective study to investigate patch test reactivity among patients with clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis who were referred to the allergy clinic at the King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, between April 2008 and March 2010.PATIENTS AND METHODSOf the 196 patients referred to the allergy clinic over the 2-year period, 91 (46.4%) patients reacted to one or more patch test allergens, and these patients were included in this study. The study group included 82 (91.1%) of Saudi nationality and 9 (8.9%) patients of other nationalities. The patch test was performed using the T.R.U.E TEST, containing 24 allergens/allergen mixes.RESULTSOf the 91 cases who reacted positively to one or more allergens, 67 (73.6%) were females with a mean age of 37 (8.3 years) and 24 (26.4%) were males with a mean age of 34 (11.6 years). Thirty-three (36.2%) patients reacted to nickel sulfate, 14 (15.3%) to p-phenylenediamine, 13 (14.2%) to p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin, 13 (14.2%) to thimerosal, and 9 (9.8%) to colophony. Reactivity against the rest of the allergens was not remarkable. A significantly higher percentage of females reacted to nickel sulfate (84.8% vs 15.2% in males; P=.0001), p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (92.3% vs 7.7%; P=.0001), and thimerosal (76.9% vs 23.1%; P=.03).CONCLUSIONSPatch test reactivity to nickel sulfate was high. The pattern of contact allergy observed in this study indicates the need for large-scale investigations to identify local allergens responsible for contact allergy and for formulation of policies directed towards avoidance of exposure.

Hand eczema: Evaluation of 250 patients

Hand Eczema: Evaluation of 250 Patients

The aims of this cross-sectional study were to establish the prevalence measures of contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in 8th grade schoolchildren (aged 12-16 years) in Odense, Denmark, and to examine the associations with atopic dermatitis, inhalant allergy and hand eczema. Contact allergy to a standard series allergen was found in 15.2% of schoolchildren. The point prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis was 0.7% and the lifetime prevalence 7.2%, predominantly in girls. The most common contact allergens were nickel (8.6%) and fragrance mix (1.8%). Nickel allergy was clinically relevant in 69% and fragrance allergy in 29% of cases. A significant association was found between contact allergy and hand eczema while no association was found between contact allergy and atopic dermatitis or inhalant allergy. In the future this cohort of schoolchildren will be followed with regard to the course and development of atopic diseases, hand eczema and contact dermatitis. Key words: school-

One hundred consecutive patients with hand eczema were patch tested with the Indian Standard Series and indigenous antigens after a detailed history and clinical examination. Both sexes were involved and the majority of them were in the age group between 20-39 years (56%). Their occupational profile varied in order of frequency from household work (37%), to masons (14%), students (11%), factory workers (7%), and others (31%). Itching was the most common presenting complaint (93%). A history of atopy was found in 36% of the patients. The predominant sites involved were the palms (43%), followed by fingers (32%), dorsum (17%), and the entire hand (8%). Dry, scaly skin was the most common morphological picture, followed by hyperpigmentation, fissuring, and lichenification. Based on history, clinical examination and patch test results, the diagnosis was made as allergic contact dermatitis in 67% of cases and irritant contact dermatitis in 15% of cases. Positive patch tests with one or more allergens were noted in 67% of the patients. Vegetables (21%) were found to be the most common sensitizers, followed by nickel sulphate (20%), potassium dichromate (18%), and others. Wet work, soaps, and detergents were found to be the most offending irritants. The present study confirmed the fact that hand eczema is a multifactorial disease caused by both irritants and allergens.

Nickel allergy in the United States: A public health issue in need of a “nickel directive”

Introduction Contact dermatitis (CD) is a highly prevalent skin disease in the workplace caused by repeated dermal exposures to skin irritating chemicals, contact allergens and/or physical factors. CD occurs in two forms, as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) which differ in pathophysiology and risk factors. The objective of this review was to identify job, work-related and personal risk factors for CD. Methods Medline and Embase were searched for articles published between 1990 and June 2020. Prospective cohort and case-control studies were included when the outcome was a work-related CD. Risk of Bias was analysed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. Meta-analyses and grading of the evidence were conducted when feasible. Results In total, 26 study populations and 52 risk factors for CD were identified. Meta-analyses found moderate to high quality evidence for associations between wet work and ICD (OR: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.21 – 2.01) and atopic dermatitis and ICD (OR: 2.4, 95%CI: 1.89 – 3.15). The following occupational groups showed a significantly increased risk of CD in two or more studies: health care workers, hairdressers, blue collar workers, painters, metal workers and cleaners. Discussion A better understanding of individual susceptibility factors may further contribute to refining the association between chemical exposures and occupational CD. A limitation of this systematic review are missing risk factors associated with ACD, which are often investigated in cross-sectional studies. Conclusion Both work-related and personal risk factors were associated with CD in a working context.

"Slime" May Not be so Benign: A Cause of Hand Dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis have different pathogenic mechanisms. It is therefore plausible that the epidermal expression of HLA-DR and the invariant chain associated with antigen processing and presentation might differ between allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis. We have quantified the volume of epidermal HLA-DR and invariant chain reactivity and the total epidermal volume in allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis using confocal laser scanning microscopy and indirect immunofluorescence on acetone-fixed 25 microns thick vertical skin sections. Eight nickel allergic patients were patch-tested with 5% nickel sulfate and 8 healthy volunteers were patch-tested with 4% sodium lauryl sulfate. Skin biopsy specimens were taken at 0, 6, 24, and 72 h after application of the patch tests. Sodium lauryl sulfate induced a statistically significant increased epidermal volume at 24 h and 72 h compared to 0 h and 6 h (p < 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas an increase in epidermal volume in the allergic contact dermatitis group was not noted until 72 h after patch testing with nickel sulfate compared to 0, 6 h (p < 0.001) and 24 h (p < 0.004). No significant changes in the epidermal volume of HLA-DR reactivity were found at any time point within or between the two groups, nor was there any significant change in the epidermal volume of invariant chain reactivity in the allergic contact dermatitis group. In the irritant contact dermatitis group, however, the epidermal volume of invariant chain reactivity was significantly reduced from 17 +/- 8 x 10(3) microns 3 at 24 h to 9 +/- 3 x 10(3) microns 3 at 72 h (p < 0.04), which was also significantly lower than the 14 +/- 4 x 10(3) microns 3 observed in allergic contact dermatitis at 72 h (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the invariant chain expression was significantly lower than the HLA-DR reactivity in the irritant contact dermatitis group at 72 h (p < 0.001). The decrease of invariant chain reactivity at 72 h in irritant contact dermatitis might reflect an epitope-induced alteration by sodium lauryl sulfate or a down-regulated biosynthesis of the invariant chain due to variance in local cytokine production between allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis.